We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Write protected SD card problem
Options
Comments
-
mr_fishbulb wrote: »I remember reading this on the SANS site. They were comparing it to the write-protect switch you get on some USB sticks (very useful if you don't want corporate AV software deleting all your penetration testing tools). http://isc.sans.edu/diary.html?storyid=10588
Quite funny, imagining this guy acting like James Bond at cocktail parties, pulling out his mini-SD reader etc.
Looks like it's DVD/CDs or find one of those rare/expensive write-protected USB drives.0 -
So you can't trust the writeprotect feature when using it on a compromised system like you could with floppy discs?
You could never really trust the floppy either. It can be overriden within the firmware or as another user suggested by tampering with the lock switch. You can also remove the soft disc from within the floppy and place it in a host casing that has no switch.0 -
You could never really trust the floppy either. It can be overriden within the firmware or as another user suggested by tampering with the lock switch.
Last time I looked into floppies, it was considered 'practically' safe because of the difficulties in malware finding the right firmware to alter a particular floppy drive. A bit like the argument again bios rootkits I suppose.
I can't say I've ever worried that someone might be changing the casings on my floppy discs0 -
It doesn't connect to anything - it isn't a switch, it just presses (or doesn't) a switch in the reader - a blob pf stuff in the 'lock' or 'unlock' poition will make it so forever :-)
Bit pointless it having one then IMO..
thanks for the advice ill give it a whirl.one of the famous 50 -
geordieracer wrote: »Bit pointless it having one then IMO..
thanks for the advice ill give it a whirl.
It's basically a failsafe against windows (or more likely the user) accidentally overwriting or deleting files that they don't want to. It shouldn't be considered a security device unless the thieves in question have no fingers0 -
It's just to reduce the risk of accidents, it doesn't encrypt anything or affect the gubbins, just more a guide for the compueter to say 'the owner doesn't want to overwrite this stuff, so let's not'0
-
just more a guide for the compueter to say 'the owner doesn't want to overwrite this stuff, so let's not'
Or in the case of windows: "The owner don't want this to be overwritten, but let's do it anyway cos it'll be hilarious! Better yet, let's wipe the whole bleedin' lot, wedding pictures un' all"
...although I'm not entirely sure why windows would speak like a pirate.0 -
Or in the case of windows: "The owner don't want this to be overwritten, but let's do it anyway cos it'll be hilarious! Better yet, let's wipe the whole bleedin' lot, wedding pictures un' all"
...although I'm not entirely sure why windows would speak like a pirate.
Must be its West Country heritage.0 -
Move along, nothing to see.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards