We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Scan.co.uk trying it on with me.
Comments
-
Thanks Flyboy152, it seems they have clarified their position on DSR (but still won't budge) see my previous post.0
-
Unfortunately scan are correct in this case.
Once you unseal a computer/laptop with a windows oem product key you are unsealing licenced software.
It's access to the product key with you could copy and use that's the problem, even if you don't intend to.
:wall: :wall: :wall: :wall:
No they are not.The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark0 -
Absolutely. It's just another example of the MSE parrot's litany -"Not fit for purpose - squawk.I could go on.
Mis-sold - squawk.
Section 75 - squawk.
Bad customer service - squawk."
Let me try and explain for you simply
Fit For PurposeComputer: Computes, does not bend.Not Fit For Purpose
Bendy toy: Bends, does not compute.Computer: Bends, does not compute.Hope that helps.
Bendy toy: Computes, does not bend.
Laptops bend=fit for purpose
Laptops do not bend=not fit for purpose.
:wall:
I swear that some people really do forget what this site is for.The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark0 -
All of this "should it bend" nonsense is totally irrelevant. The consumer can cancel under the DSRs for any reason, as long as it is within the cooling-off period.The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark0
-
Thanks Flyboy152, it seems they have clarified their position on DSR (but still won't budge) see my previous post.
Then you need to formally cancel the contract with them and demand a refund. If they refuse, court and trading standards is the answer.The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark0 -
Flyboy, if it was that black and white, I could buy pair of shoes, wear them and scuff them, then send them back under DSR. Or buy a pair of trousers, rip them, then send them back.
The question is whether the OP has done anything with the laptop, even taking it out of the packaging, that invalidates them sending it back under the DSR.
Does this fall under the same category of personalised products, which cannot be sent back unless they are faulty or not as described.0 -
Flyboy, if it was that black and white, I could buy pair of shoes, wear them and scuff them, then send them back under DSR. Or buy a pair of trousers, rip them, then send them back.
The question is whether the OP has done anything with the laptop, even taking it out of the packaging, that invalidates them sending it back under the DSR.
Does this fall under the same category of personalised products, which cannot be sent back unless they are faulty or not as described.
Have actually read the Distance Selling Regulations?The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark0 -
If they are not budging then off to court you go.
However if the judge rules in Scans favor then its a dangerous precedent for every online retailer selling laptops and computers.
I BELIEVE there hasn't been a test case yet.0 -
CoolHotCold wrote: »If they are not budging then off to court you go.
However if the judge rules in Scans favor then its a dangerous precedent for every online retailer selling laptops and computers.
I BELIEVE there hasn't been a test case yet.
I am pretty sure there many cases where people have taken online retailers to court, for ignoring their obligations under the Distance Selling Regulations.The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark0 -
Ignoring obligations yes.
But Scan have taken their own interpertation on DSR's. Computers and Laptops or Netbooks/tablets, items that come pre-loaded with licensed software hasn't been tested before in courts.
I can see both points, but there has to be clarity in the law, and unfortunately theres Grey areas in the law such as the DSR's or SoGA. A judge may well consider licensed software that has been pre loaded onto a hardware device exception under the DSR's if the seal is broken.
Tough to judge.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.3K Spending & Discounts
- 243.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.6K Life & Family
- 256.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards