We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
House Price Crash 5
Comments
-
CB1979 wrote:yep that's life
obviously you're looking at 1 bedroom places?
Hold on... only a couple of posts ago you said:CB1979 wrote:people who earn a decent wage CAN afford a decent house.
it's as easy peasy as 1-2-3, A-B-C, you-know-me, H-J-P, F-Y-E :money:
So on one hand, decent earners CAN afford decent houses. Then you accept that many clearly cannot...
CB1979 wrote:but 3.5-4 x multiple is about right, so if you're after a starter home, surely a 1 bedder that you CAN afford is better than getting a 2/3 bedder that you CAN'T afford?
that seems to be the biggest problem is that people who want on the ladder aren't prepared to be on the bottom rung to start with.
obviously just my opinion.
I refer again to a previous post where you stated that decent earners CAN afford decent housing. You have changed your mind... now you are saying that a decent earner but FTB shouldnt expect to get decent housing, rather they should expect to start at the bottom.Dead_Eye_Jones wrote:Nah, you're wrong, I bought a nice starter 3 bed family semi in a lovely area on about your wage. London suburb actually. There are places in my road starting at about 150k for 2 bed terrace, depending on size and state of repair they go up to about 230k. Nice big gardens, 20mins from central london, safe, green, you really can have your cake and eat it. Its a myth that there are no affordable homes, Im glad I didnt belive the hype and went out there to find my place. Unfortunately it does take effort - and I think thats the problem most lazy Brits face. Why go out looking for those little pockets of ideality when I could drink through my weekly wage down the local boozer whilst waiting for the government to sort my life out.
A typical example is the 250k 2 bed flats in my town that seem to be selling fast, I guess people see the fancy adverts, get sucked in by the swish marketing and financial deals, what it seems that people dont realise or dont take the time to look up is that if you dig a bit further you can buy a whole house for so much less. I guess people never see past those flat prices "well if a flat costs that much a house will cost..." - shame really.
The other big gap in this affordibility debate is DEPOSIT!! People seem to think that affordability = 3x salary. Wrong. Affordability is actually 3x Salary + DEPOSIT!!
Anecdotal. I can easily provide exception to what you say and the general view does not agree with yours. Furthermore, I fall into your 'deposit' bracket... I have a 20k deposit. Even going to 4x salary (which I consider to be pushing matters) and I can only afford £120k... this at best gets me into the bottom rung in my area.sm9ai wrote:3.5 - 4 x multiple is about right, but its nearer 4 - 5x in my area.
If you examine the long term trend, you will find that 3x is the long term average.2 + 2 = 4
except for the general public when it can mean whatever they want it to.0 -
Alan
From what I believe Thamesmead has a history of not being that great.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thamesmead
but saying you cant afford a 2 bed house as theres nothing under 300k or whatever is just claptrap, as deadeye jhones says.
there would be other properties in that bracket- but I specified 2 bed houses, there would be of course flats elsewhere or 1 bed houses IYSWIM:beer: Well aint funny how its the little things in life that mean the most? Not where you live, the car you drive or the price tag on your clothes.
Theres no dollar sign on piece of mind
This Ive come to know...
So if you agree have a drink with me, raise your glasses for a toast :beer:0 -
lynzpower wrote:Alan
From what I believe Thamesmead has a history of not being that great.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thamesmead
but saying you cant afford a 2 bed house as theres nothing under 300k or whatever is just claptrap, as deadeye jhones says.
there would be other properties in that bracket- but I specified 2 bed houses, there would be of course flats elsewhere or 1 bed houses IYSWIM
Yup, ISWYM, but out of choice would you live there? Snobbishness aside, would you really want to live there?
On the outskirts of Croydon backing onto the old Croydon Airport is a housing estate called Roundshaw, it's been redeveloped over the last few years as, well how can I put this politely.....Thames TV used to use it as a film location for "The Bill" when they wanted to portray a drug and crime infested South London Housing estate - you get the idea.
The residents burnt down the local pub and shops with such regularity that eventually they were boarded up and closed.
Houses are a snip there, they are within the catchment area of one of the better schools in the Surrey area and close to Valley retail park, and walking distance from some pretty expensive homes.
Would I live there? Not on your nelly:)0 -
Oh we're not still banging on about a crash are we?
Don't you know that the Bank of England received worldwide acclaim for engineering a soft landing last year?
You only get a crash after a period of insane and rampant HPI.
Now then, what's this, asking prices in London up 23% in a year?
Must be all those hardworking Poles. Gawd bless 'em. They deserve our homes as they work 7 days a week without complaint.
I wonder if the current homeowners on this thread put in the same graft.
Nah, didn't think so.
Still we shouldn't complain. It's always been incredibly expensive to buy property. Like in 2001 when IRs were last at 5% and property prices were @ 90K.
Excuse me while I buy a crack den in Thamesmead @ x4 my above average wage.
:rotfl:0 -
I must admit i am beginning to feel sorry for you meanmachine.
I can see you are desperate to buy a house and i feel you will never be able to afford to..god bless you.0 -
mr.broderick wrote:I must admit i am beginning to feel sorry for you meanmachine.
I can see you are desperate to buy a house and i feel you will never be able to afford to..god bless you.
When inflation is about (and this includes house prices) things go up in value.
Lets hope we call can afford to eat soon, we all like inflation so no-one should complain if Bread is £5 a loaf.
Speculate on human need and get what you deserve.0 -
Yup, ISWYM, but out of choice would you live there? Snobbishness aside, would you really want to live there?
Honestly? Probably not. South londons not for me, tried it once- never again!
I might be tempted towards ilford though? that house aint the best, it was a stray one that turned up in a london search, and not essex, but Ilfords alright.
I wouldnt personally choose to buy any of those places, like you Alan, Ive come round to the opinoin that paying interest to the bank monthly simply isnt moneysaving so Im selling to rent. As you know, you can rent a great place in an area you could never afford for less than a mortgage on a 1 bed flat round here
:beer: Well aint funny how its the little things in life that mean the most? Not where you live, the car you drive or the price tag on your clothes.
Theres no dollar sign on piece of mind
This Ive come to know...
So if you agree have a drink with me, raise your glasses for a toast :beer:0 -
I wonder if the current homeowners on this thread put in the same graft.
I do not work 7 days a week.
But if I couldn't afford something I really wanted (or needed) then I would consider
a) working longer hours
b) getting training to improve my posistion
c) starting my own business
d) cutting back on my expenditure
I would suggest people who feel hard done by look at this.
http://www.globalrichlist.com/
If you have been born in the UK then you are incredibly lucky.Still we shouldn't complain.
Well you can spend your time doing that if you like.
I do however believe that my 4 suggestions above might help improve your situation more quickly.0 -
Out of all those things, Starting your own business is the least likely to put you a position to buy what you want. It will suck up all your money and you won't be able to get a mortgage (well nothing sensible) until you have at least three years trading accounts showing a profit.
The other three are resonable.0 -
Starting your own business is the least likely to put you a position to buy what you want.
Depends on what your plans are.
For some skilled people a business may be better than getting low pay stacking shelves or working in a bar.
My ideas were not "get rich quick" ideas.
I'm just saying that if you WORK and SAVE you can improve your situation and the four options demonstrate that there are differnt ways to do it.
For some people lots of hours stacking shelves may be OK.
For others training or a business idea (possibly in addition to the main job) may be better than lots of low paid work.It will suck up all your money
So if I buy a bucket and a shammy to wash cars on the weekend then that will suck up all my money will it?until you have at least three years trading accounts showing a profit
Not necessarily.
If you were (for exmaple) washing cars on a weekend then you would still put down your main job for the mortgage.
The extra would be helpful for a deposit, moving costs, rainy day money or buying things for the house.The other three are resonable.
I think ALL of them are better than complaining and doing nothing.
That's if you REALLY want to do something about it.
Obviously some people are never happy and want it on a plate.
I am not saying it's easy, just that there are things that people can do to improve their situation if they really want to.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards