We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
URGENT advice needed. Letting agent threatening to change locks on my door
Options
Comments
-
-
propertyman wrote: »Apologies for contradicting you but that is incorrect. If the tenancy allows for viewings in the last month, then the landlord has a contractual right to it, as has the tenant to meet it. That is settled law.
However if the tenant refuses access, then the landlord can apply for a court order to gain access, and may claim damages for loss of rent as posted earlier. What the court decides will depend on the tenancy wording and the circumstances.
A wise tenant should ask for restrictions on the clause such as not after 7pm not on Sundays etc.
Thanks, it was not my understanding but I am happy to be corrected if that is the case.
As it relates to the original issue it would still not imply any obligation to provide a key. The tenant could still facilitate repairs and viewings by providing access at a convenient time.0 -
propertyman wrote: »A wise tenant should ask for restrictions on the clause such as not after 7pm not on Sundays etc.
A court will always look at what the reasonable behaviour would be.
Even if the clause only states that the tenant allows visits after a notice, the tenant will be safe imposing reasonable restrictions.0 -
jjlandlord wrote: »OP has had a five lever lock professionally fitted, at her own costs, following advice from the police.
Immaterial, did tenant get permission to fit it ?ANURADHA KOIRALA ??? go on throw it in google.0 -
Why don't you simply do as they ask and contact them and explain what happened? Why go on the offensive?
Because, perhaps, their initial contact is so outrageous and unlawful?...much enquiry having been made concerning a gentleman, who had quitted a company where Johnson was, and no information being obtained; at last Johnson observed, that 'he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney'.0 -
It's a choice really then isn't it. Either go guns all blazing and threatening this and that and be prepared to move, or tread a bit more carefully and stay put. Depends what the OP wants the outcome to be how they should behave. I thought to start with that they wanted to stay and have the contract renewed for another year but now it seems that they don't so that's fine, give them a mouthful and move on.0
-
Locks on doors, generally speaking, slot out and the replacement slots in. Unless the structure of the door had to be altered in some way, then no damage or alteration would be caused. It is possible that at the end of the tenancy the LL may require the door to be returned as was, even though in it's state at that time it may be more secure and less of a risk. Nowt so queer as folk.
obm0 -
oldbaldman wrote: »Locks on doors, generally speaking, slot out and the replacement slots in. Unless the structure of the door had to be altered in some way, then no damage or alteration would be caused. It is possible that at the end of the tenancy the LL may require the door to be returned as was, even though in it's state at that time it may be more secure and less of a risk. Nowt so queer as folk.
obm
Agreed, but this is a additional lock that has been fitted.ANURADHA KOIRALA ??? go on throw it in google.0 -
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards