We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Is this right?
Comments
-
As I posted earlier "Council houses do become vacant, people get LHA, people who can afford to move out and commute like I did and people will stay living in crowded accommodation."0
-
Wee_Willy_Harris wrote: »There's enough green land in Surrey to satisfy the local housing need for at least 1,000 years. Running out of land is hardly a contemporary issue, is it?
Cant see it myself, plus who wants to live surrounded by tower blocks and everybody rammed into one area.
Lets get rid of the countryside and build housing estates on it.0 -
Wee_Willy_Harris wrote: »So you accept that we need to build more social housing?
No we wouldnt need to build more if the current situation was stopped.
Its not really working is it, people leaving school and starting a family and not even having their first job lined up never mind a house.0 -
Wee_Willy_Harris wrote: »There's enough green land in Surrey to satisfy the local housing need for at least 1,000 years. Running out of land is hardly a contemporary issue, is it?0
-
Cant see it myself, plus who wants to live surrounded by tower blocks and everybody rammed into one area.
Lets get rid of the countryside and build housing estates on it.
Still plenty of room though.
Surrey population density = 667 per sq km
Monaco population density = 16,923 per sq km0 -
As I posted earlier "Council houses do become vacant, people get LHA, people who can afford to move out and commute like I did and people will stay living in crowded accommodation."
And as i stated before the population is constantly increasing, and while we are at it were are all these thousands of children going to end up working because there is not an infinite amount of jobs in this country.0 -
-
Wee_Willy_Harris wrote: »Still plenty of room though.
Surrey population density = 667 per sq km
Monaco population density = 16,923 per sq km
Do you live in Surrey0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards