Is this right?

Jimmy_31

Wee_Willy_Harris wrote: »

They are overcrowded because the size of their property isn't sufficient to meet the demands of the household. It's really simple maths and the legislation surrounding it is over 30 years old! Do catch up.

You really are a joke, either answer the question or dont bother posting a dodge.

Wee_Willy_Harris

Graham_Devon wrote: »

Well yes. Dictionary definition and all that. Brilliant.

Can we delve into this a little further, or is anything other than dictionary definition to be ignored.

I'll ask again. WHY are they overcrowded?

Whilst I can see where you are going with this, the facts of the matter remain the same. They are overcrowded because the size of their property isn't sufficient to meet the demands of the household. That is the only direct causal factor.

Wee_Willy_Harris

Jimmy_31 wrote: »

You really are a joke, either answer the question or dont bother posting a dodge.

I thought I did. But I'll give it one more try for the hard of understanding..... They are overcrowded because the size of their property isn't sufficient to meet the demands of the household.

Wee_Willy_Harris

Jimmy_31 wrote: »

You seem to think we should just carry on housing sponging scumbags, why is that.

There may be more costs involved doing what i suggested but over time it will eventually save money. constantly giving parasites free money and housing does not save any money.

And how will it save money?

Jimmy_31

chewmylegoff wrote: »

I believe this is what you normally refer to as a "dodge". What is a hard working person. How is it defined?

Somebody who leaves school and then gets a job and goes to that job day in day out and then saves a house deposit then buys a house so that they are not a burden to the state.

I will answer what i feel will be said next ie but letting them have a council house will make them a burden to the state. yes it will but only for the length of time it takes them to save a deposit for their own house and not a lifetime of being a burden

Graham_Devon

Wee_Willy_Harris wrote: »

Whilst I can see where you are going with this, the facts of the matter remain the same. They are overcrowded because the size of their property isn't sufficient to meet the demands of the household. That is the only direct causal factor.

So whilst you admit you can see where I am going, you are going to ignore it (surprise) and stick to the dictionary definition?

Now, what was it I said earlier when I got accused of not debating, and throwing toys? Point proven. How can you possibly debate with this level and ignorance and pedance?

Is there any point in asking I wonder? WHY are they overcrowded willy?

Wee_Willy_Harris

Graham_Devon wrote: »

Well yes. Dictionary definition and all that. Brilliant.

Can we delve into this a little further, or is anything other than dictionary definition to be ignored.

I'll ask again. WHY are they overcrowded?



Oh right ISA's. The tax "break" available to everyone in the country who is over 16.

I suppose you'd call the personal allowance a tax break for every worker?

I suppose you'd call the lower rate of VAT on some womens sanitary products as "tax breaks for women"?

You asked for an example of a tax break for savers. I gave one. I'm not sure what you were expecting to happen.

Jimmy_31

Wee_Willy_Harris wrote: »

If it's that good, why don't you join them?

You will need to explain this to me.

Have you read the thread at all.

Jimmy_31

Wee_Willy_Harris wrote: »

Have ISAs (for example) passed you by?

Ive got my house deposit in an isa. cant remember the government saying only people saving for a house can have an isa.

Wee_Willy_Harris

Graham_Devon wrote: »

So whilst you admit you can see where I am going, you are going to ignore it (surprise) and stick to the dictionary definition?

Now, what was it I said earlier when I got accused of not debating, and throwing toys? Point proven. How can you possibly debate with this level and ignorance and pedance?

I didn't make the "toys" comment, so your free to debate away with me as much as you like. Perhaps it would be easier if you just showed your cards and argued your case instead of asking me to do it for you.