Llz tab

Alias_Omega

Im over on LLZ too, though i cant remember the username.

Im more of a reader than a poster, though Jeffrey in the past and MTG has replied to my threads.

I wonder if Jeffrey makes any £££ out of the links in his signature, and if anyone does ring him up at £1.50 p/m. They could probably post all the info on the forum in drips, and he would eventually give them all the info they need.

jjlandlord

Alias_Omega wrote: »

I wonder if Jeffrey makes any £££ out of the links in his signature, and if anyone does ring him up at £1.50 p/m. They could probably post all the info on the forum in drips, and he would eventually give them all the info they need.

He must be paying LLZ to be a topic expert and be allowed to advertise.
As he, an other topic experts, have been active there for years there must be a positive return.

islandlass

Mind_the_Gap wrote: »

Actually, it's more like a few lonely people shouting futilely up a drainpipe...(except for westminster and other present company of course). That aardvarkfan posts some unpleasant things, doesn't he?

There are so many people posting there that I have never seen before and the general quality of advice (old posters still posting excepted) appears to leave quite a bit to be desired!

"Michael Clayton" is worrying about you MTG - isn't that touching??

wilfred3

islandlass wrote: »

"Michael Clayton" is worrying about you MTG - isn't that touching??

I think his post#281 may seem a bit of a climb-down considering his previous comments on the situation. This may be either as a result of having the situation explained to him, or taking the time to read through the whole thread. He seems to have toned down his attitude in this post. This is typical of what happens when people wade in without knowing all the facts, or reading through the entire thread.

zara*elise

I was a long-standing member of a forum. I apparently offended someone and was banned with no explanation of why. I decided to set up a similar forum a few months later. Those who agreed the moderators were wrong to ban someone joined our forum, the others stayed. As far as I'm concerned, I learnt a lot about how NOT to treat members, and ensure that everyone is dealt with fairly when problems arise. And now our forum is more popular and has been features on TV and in magazines for being a friendly, supportive site.

So well done for taking a stand and I hope you keep giving good advice!

Werdnal

Just for info - Admin have made a statement over on the "banned" thread if anyone interested.

Richard_Webster

I'm not a newbie here and have been on LLZ as long but don't post there so much and don't often look at the TAB ("Take a Break") thread and I have to confess to having supported Jeffrey (not Jefferey - he won't like that) against MTG on matters such as the truth of the Bible - although there are some prophecies by Isaiah etc that I believe have been fulfilled that he wouldn't accept - "Behold a virgin shall conceive and bear a son...." That'll probably start MTG going....

However having read large chunks of THAT thread on LLZ I'm still don't understand why she was banned. Surely you shouldn't be banned just for saying things that others don't agree with.

Richard_Webster

Just for info - Admin have made a statement over on the "banned" thread if anyone interested.

Didn't see that - must've come while I was composing my post. For the benefit of others it is at: http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?38319-mtg-banned&p=305661#post305661

Pity that they didn't do this sooner!

relay

Richard_Webster wrote: »

Didn't see that - must've come while I was composing my post. For the benefit of others it is at: http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?38319-mtg-banned&p=305661#post305661

Pity that they didn't do this sooner!

Maybe they have a life outside the forum. There's a thought, eh? :cool:

rodent

It is good & a relief to learn that J is not the moderator.



However, I am not saying that MTG is the only offender, just someone who has raised her profile in this regard the most – to the point where too much of our time is being spent on her posts.

In these hard economic times it appears you have become a creator of a job for someone !


An analysis of the posts shows MTG posts are 83% off topic. I’m sure others may have similar profiles, but this shows that basically the forum is being used as a personal sounding board by some.

Did someone press the wrong button on their calculator or what?
Or is there a decimal point missing 8.3% maybe ??


This is acceptable to us within reason, providing they do not infringe the rules. Infringements not only offend many, they lose us advertising revenue. I have direct evidence of this.

...but not as much revenue as an empty forum tho.