We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Combi Boiler or Conventional?
Comments
-
Go with the normal condensing boiler as suggested.
Ozskin/Plumb1 You still need good mains pressure/volume to run an unvented cyl though don't you?
Corgi Guy.Ask to see CIPHE (Chartered Institute of Plumbing & Heating Engineering)0 -
Canucklehead wrote:Go with the normal condensing boiler as suggested.
Ozskin/Plumb1 You still need good mains pressure/volume to run an unvented cyl though don't you?
Corgi Guy.
Less than a combi;) CG, and a lower gas rate, and you always have the backup of having hot water(immersion heater) if your boiler fails.
We all have our favourates:cool:A thankyou is payment enough .0 -
I conclude that:
Combis are most suitable for small flats as part of a new installation.
Combis can be unreliable and run the heating system at a high pressure.
Combi boilers have a shorter life spanthan conventional ones.
Combis are simpler to install hence their possible pushing by some companies.
I still don't understand why some combis don't have a separate HW storage tank (say 1/3 of the normal cylinder) which could fit unobtrusively into most houses.
And I don't know why Ozkin advised an external pressure vessel for the unvented cylinder?
Anyway, I thank everyone for their most helpful advice which has led us to decide to have a new conventional boiler with an unvented cylinder in the roof.0 -
Well, I wouldn't entirely agree, and apologies for probably confusing you all over again! I had a Potterton combi in a 3-bed semi - granted, there were only 2 of us in the house, but it ran all the radiators and the hot water. It was still going strong 8 years later when we moved, having never been serviced and had a single visit from a repair man (who cleaned some gunk out and charged 200 quid for 20 mins work, but still a lot cheaper than a repair contract). If the houses we've since had hadn't already had systems installed, I would have chosen the combi again - the hot water was always piping hot, and we managed to run two showers together or turn on a hot/cold tap without freezing/scalding the person showering, and the electricity bills were lower than when we'd had the big cylinder. Plus, we put a tiny radiator into the airing cupboard once the cylinder was ripped out, which gave us loads of hanging space for drying clothes.0
-
Hi This might help explain about the expansion vessel............
http://www.plumbingpages.com/featurepages/HWdpsamazon2.cfm
Good decision ..Boiler/cylinder.
Corgi Guy.Ask to see CIPHE (Chartered Institute of Plumbing & Heating Engineering)0 -
Dear Jemball, canucklehead has beaten me to it. A seperate vessel will not require the servicing of an internal, or calling a plumber to sort out any probs to repressure the system. Not seen this new tank before, but its not a big job to have an externally vessel, maybee an extra couple of hours work. but you do see a seperate small tank. Heres to happy power showering0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards