We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Disposing of chattels in repossessed flat
Options
Comments
-
This thread is basically covering the same ground as Vendor wants their stuff back! see https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/3184790 where I think the proper legal response was provided as followsprinceofpounds wrote: »http://www.gillhams.com/dictionary/116.cfm
a bailment was established. You have to take reasonable care of these goods and give them back.
Or you could have a look at the advice provided by the CAB on 'Keeping lost, found and uncollected goods' see http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/index/your_world/consumer_affairs/keeping_lost_found_and_uncollected_goods.htm0 -
Wouldn't the property be viewed as having been abandoned?I must go, I have lives to ruin and hearts to breakMy attitude depends on my Latitude 49° 55' 0" N 6° 19' 60 W0
-
Careful_with_that_Axe wrote: »Wouldn't the property be viewed as having been abandoned?
Uncollected or abandoned goods
A person may leave goods which belong to them with someone else and appear to have abandoned them. Examples include:-- uncollected goods left by a tenant in a landlord’s property
If you have uncollected or abandoned goods, you have a duty to look after them, but cannot use them or treat them as your own.
You must take good care of goods which have been left with you. You may be held legally responsible if the goods are lost, stolen or damaged while in your care. However, the amount of care you need to take depends on whether or not you have a contract with the owner.
Examples of when you have a contract with the owner include when goods have been left in your shop for repair or a tenant has moved out of your property and left their belongings behind.
Do you have a contract with the owner? Not if they're the tenants maybe, and possibly not several after someone has moved out... (After 12 months I would assume that any seasonal stuff has been noted as left behind)
It would however strike me as unfair if the number of items restricted use of part of the property.
If the loft is full I would want it emptying so I could put my stuff in. Ditto garage and any rooms.0 -
poppysarah wrote: »Uncollected or abandoned goods
A person may leave goods which belong to them with someone else and appear to have abandoned them. Examples include:-- uncollected goods left by a tenant in a landlord’s property
You must take good care of goods which have been left with you. You may be held legally responsible if the goods are lost, stolen or damaged while in your care. However, the amount of care you need to take depends on whether or not you have a contract with the owner.
Examples of when you have a contract with the owner include when goods have been left in your shop for repair or a tenant has moved out of your property and left their belongings behind.
Do you have a contract with the owner? Not if they're the tenants maybe, and possibly not several after someone has moved out... (After 12 months I would assume that any seasonal stuff has been noted as left behind)
It would however strike me as unfair if the number of items restricted use of part of the property.
If the loft is full I would want it emptying so I could put my stuff in. Ditto garage and any rooms.
Interesting. Thank you!I must go, I have lives to ruin and hearts to breakMy attitude depends on my Latitude 49° 55' 0" N 6° 19' 60 W0 -
The relevant law is...
Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977
Think these guidelines also apply.... (with approriate changes...)
http://www.landlordzone.co.uk/uncollected_goods.htmA suggested procedure for legally disposing of uncollected tenant's goods:
• Make every effort to trace the tenant/s to their new address or contact them through any forwarding address you may have.
•If you are owed monies you must keep goods for 3 months before disposing of them. If you are not owed money a reasonable period, typically 28 days is acceptable before selling the goods.
• Write to the tenant by registered post or recorded delivery with a legal notice. This will notify them that the goods are available for collection and that they will be kept for up to three months.
• Make sure your notice clearly identifies you as the landlord and gives full contact details for yourself as landlord and include complete contact details.
• If the goods remain unclaimed after 3 months you can sell them to a buyer, who will receive good title to them. The original owner will therefore lose all rights to the goods.
• Once you have covered your expenses in this process and any rent arrears etc, any proceeds left over will belong to the original owner - your tenant, if they should turn up and claim within six years.
Never even occurred to me the "owner" might want it back, but I think he had a legal right.
I repaired the cooker & used it for 7 years.. on reflection it wasnae my property (might not have been "theirs" if it was on finance..)
It's all very sad: some poor sod(s) [previous owners] have lost everything & then some more (they still owe the mortgage company for any shortfall,plus expenses..). Compared to your problem they have a "real" one... Yes they could have been daft or criminal, chances are it was an unplanned & unexpected tragedy..
Cheers! Merry Easter...0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards