We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Unemployment Rate falls to 7.8% from 8%.

124»

Comments

  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    doire wrote: »
    Not if you're aged 16-24
    The number of unemployed 16-24 year olds fell by 11,000,

    Well not great if you are one of the 11,000 who did not find work, but glad to see it is falling not rising.
  • tomterm8
    tomterm8 Posts: 5,892 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    Really2 wrote: »
    Thats a bit late, Most of the cuts have been implemented for the start of new financial year. So notice were served 3 months before the 6th April. I would expect the vast majority of public sector cuts to hit in April IMHO.

    I don't really see this months figures as significant, because there is a census boost, and because the longer term trend is more or less flat at the moment.

    In terms of the public sector...

    As a rule, a large number of the job cuts will be notional... that is, rather than making people redundant, they will use natural wastage to lower the work force. This is because it is cheaper.

    In addition, many contracts which are shorter term, it is cheaper to wait the contract out than fire people.

    And, of course, many Universities and Schools will make people redundant from August, and many other organizations also have different budget years to the standard.

    All that means is that there are probably going to be few redundancies in the short term, but the state will not be hiring. Which means any effect is likely to be more drip-drip-drip than a sudden upturn in the statistics.
    “The ideas of debtor and creditor as to what constitutes a good time never coincide.”
    ― P.G. Wodehouse, Love Among the Chickens
  • GeneHunt_2
    GeneHunt_2 Posts: 286 Forumite
    The budget deficit's not shrinking and unemployment is going down!!!!

    Are the coalition actually doing anything about the deficit or just pretending?
  • ninky_2
    ninky_2 Posts: 5,872 Forumite
    doire wrote: »
    Not if you're aged 16-24

    too true. we seem to have an aging workforce. i wonder how much of the increased employment numbers is actually due to people having to defer retirement?

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2011/apr/13/retirees-stay-work-affordability


    Two-fifths of people who intended to retire this year will have to work for an extra six years because they cannot afford to stop working, according to a study by Prudential.

    The pension provider's Class of 2011 report found that 38% of people are delaying their retirement, and 40% of those say they will have to work until they are 70 to have a comfortable income.
    Those who will not reason, are bigots, those who cannot, are fools, and those who dare not, are slaves. - Lord Byron
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    GeneHunt wrote: »
    The budget deficit's not shrinking and unemployment is going down!!!!

    Are the coalition actually doing anything about the deficit or just pretending?

    It depends on what you measure. Departmental spending is falling but Government spending is going up after you adjust for inflation.

    The disconnect between the 2 things is due to the cost of servicing UK public debt rising as the level of debt rises.

    IIRC, Government spending as a whole is set to rise by 0.9% pa in real terms (ie after adjusting for inflation) over the course of this Parliament.

    Of course the mathematics of the situation is very simple: the later the deficit falls, the greater the proportion of Government spending will go on interest. By running a series of deficits, Governments since the 1960s have put this generation of taxpayers in a poor fiscal position. Labour and Tory seem to be arguing over whether to put the next generation into a much worse or merely a worse one.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.