We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Shares ISA - Would I be wasting my money?

2»

Comments

  • jimjames wrote: »
    Hargreaves Lansdown and iii do not charge annual management fees for most funds.

    Thanks,
    Would you know if you can purchase iShares ETF's via these brokers?
  • jimjames
    jimjames Posts: 19,255 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Thanks,
    Would you know if you can purchase iShares ETF's via these brokers?
    You certainly can but they aren't the cheapest for investments other than unit trusts.

    Why are you looking at ETFs rather than funds? If this is your first share investment I would think that funds would be a better startng point
    Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.
  • jimjames wrote: »
    Why are you looking at ETFs rather than funds?

    I've read some good things about them
  • jimjames wrote: »
    Why are you looking at ETFs rather than funds? If this is your first share investment I would think that funds would be a better startng point

    What sort of funds do you mean?
  • switch76
    switch76 Posts: 114 Forumite
    If you aren't going to invest more than £5100 then I wouldn't bother putting it in an ISA.

    Even if you made 10% each year, your £5100 would be worth £13,228.09 after 10 years. You wouldn't have CGT to pay.
  • switch76 wrote: »
    If you aren't going to invest more than £5100 then I wouldn't bother putting it in an ISA.

    Even if you made 10% each year, your £5100 would be worth £13,228.09 after 10 years. You wouldn't have CGT to pay.

    I agree with what you say. But if I invested my half my ISA allowance in a Shares ISA every year, then CGT could be a consideration
  • switch76
    switch76 Posts: 114 Forumite
    I agree with what you say. But if I invested my half my ISA allowance in a Shares ISA every year, then CGT could be a consideration

    If you plan on adding money every year rather than a one-off, then an ISA would be useful.

    You will be sheltered from CGT. You also don't have to pay income tax on bonds. Your dividends will still have income tax taken off before you receive them.

    I think TD Waterhouse has no administration fee for shares, funds and ETFs providing your account is worth £5100 or more. HL will charge you 0.5% admin fee for shares.
  • Eco_Miser
    Eco_Miser Posts: 5,059 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Another advantage of using an ISA is that you don't have to tell HMRC, you don't have to keep track of when you bought shares/funds, or how much for, or how much you paid the broker - all potentially needed to report a capital gain outside an ISA. Remember in future you may have other capital gains that all crystallise at once when you need the money quickly.
    Eco Miser
    Saving money for well over half a century
  • jimjames
    jimjames Posts: 19,255 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    switch76 wrote: »
    If you aren't going to invest more than £5100 then I wouldn't bother putting it in an ISA.

    Even if you made 10% each year, your £5100 would be worth £13,228.09 after 10 years. You wouldn't have CGT to pay.
    I'm afraid I disagree. It may not be of benefit now but if it is no more expensive in an ISA as outside then it is worth doing. If you become a higher rate taxpayer or tax rules change then at least it is protected within the ISA.
    Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.
  • switch76
    switch76 Posts: 114 Forumite
    jimjames wrote: »
    I'm afraid I disagree. It may not be of benefit now but if it is no more expensive in an ISA as outside then it is worth doing. If you become a higher rate taxpayer or tax rules change then at least it is protected within the ISA.

    The trouble is that many providers charge a admin fee for ISAs. You mentioned HL, which is good for funds but may charge up to £200 admin fee each year for shares. If you only intend to invest £5100, why bother with the hassle.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.