We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
FAO people who know about bikes
Options
Comments
-
And that one looks cool
I like my bike but it's blue.
How about this really, really cool option of the same bike.
http://www.bikes2udirect.com/B3235.html?mv_pc=gp1
Dan.We used to to shop at Tesco. But then we saw the light.0 -
The reason you keep hearing that hybrids are so much better is simply because so many people ride supermarket Y frame £69.99 specials with barely inflated tyres, these bikes are atrocious POS that cannot be described as being a bike. Any hybrid will seem good compared to these.
The Marin is good, I wouldn't bother with this hybrid, just get some slicks.0 -
One of my son's friends has a Claud Butler Urban 200 I think, and it feels surprisingly good quality - he gives it some abuse and it keeps coming back for more.
Regarding differences between this and a mountain bike, the things that stand out to me are:
- Rigid forks, much less energy-draining than most suspension forks - don't worry about them being steel, that's pretty normal with aluminium frames. As the tyres are 35mm they'll provide plenty of cushioning for most roads and cycle paths.
- Gearing - this has three rings at the front, with 28, 38 and 48 teeth respectively. I find this about right for road use - a typical mountain bike would have smaller front rings and hence lower gears.
As someone else has said though - the wheels only have 24 spokes, which on a bike at this price is likely to make them vulnerable to pothole damage. I'd look for a 36-spoke wheel instead.
Also consider things like mudguards and a rack - e.g. the Claud Butler Windermere has those and is £235 at that site (I don't know if it's any good though!).
Finally - consider whether you really need a women's specific frame - unless you're going to be riding in a skirt you might find more choice if you look at bikes with 'compact' frames - these days the difference between 'mens' and 'womens' is often just the sizing of the frame.
[Edit: The Marin looks at least as good though, bung some Schwalbe City Jets on and it might be better - but the suspension forks and low gearing (22-32-42) still might annoy you]Long-haul Supporters DFW 120
Debt @ LBM (October 2007): £55187
Debt Now (April 2014): £0
Debt-free-date: [STRIKE]July[/STRIKE] April 2014 :j:j:j0 -
Dan_Gleebitz wrote: »How about this really, really cool option of the same bike.
http://www.bikes2udirect.com/B3235.html?mv_pc=gp1
Dan.
Ooh no, I couldn't ride a pink bike! I am not really a "girly" girl.
Billy-no-Money, that is an interesting point about mens -v- womens frame, I used to ride a small man's bike but I changed over as it was getting trickier to hoist my leg over the crossbar. Although they say handlebars etc. are better proportioned on a women's bike I haven't noticed *that* much difference.
I have the Schwalbe landcruiser tyres, I find them ideal for my commute which although mostly on tarmac does have a lot of potholes/cobbled streets and is quite rough.0 -
TBH if you've already got a bike, then spending £200 on a new one is not really the best idea, they are pretty cheap and nasty at that price, which is fine for a first bike, but if you've already got a bike, it's rather pointless.
Try a second-hand bike - http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/New-Carrera-Subway-2-Ladies-Mountain-Bike-19-Frame-/300538898730 - sold for £92 as an example0 -
TBH if you've already got a bike, then spending £200 on a new one is not really the best idea, they are pretty cheap and nasty at that price, which is fine for a first bike, but if you've already got a bike, it's rather pointless.
Try a second-hand bike - http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/New-Carrera-Subway-2-Ladies-Mountain-Bike-19-Frame-/300538898730 - sold for £92 as an example
Get your point - but there's cheap and nasty and cheap and nasty. I don't think the Claud Butler bikes fall into that category, not when there's the likes of Universal, Halfords' Apollo and Trax ranges, Dunlop-badged monstrosities and whatever tat Argos and Tesco's are selling!
These Claud Butlers are a significant step up from a full-suspension Apollo.......Long-haul Supporters DFW 120
Debt @ LBM (October 2007): £55187
Debt Now (April 2014): £0
Debt-free-date: [STRIKE]July[/STRIKE] April 2014 :j:j:j0 -
Billy-no-Money wrote: »Get your point - but there's cheap and nasty and cheap and nasty. I don't think the Claud Butler bikes fall into that category, not when there's the likes of Universal, Halfords' Apollo and Trax ranges, Dunlop-badged monstrosities and whatever tat Argos and Tesco's are selling!
These Claud Butlers are a significant step up from a full-suspension Apollo.......
Sure, but the components are still cheapo ones, Shimano don't even advertise Acera on their website, the tyres are cheap, and the X-Flow chainset is not much cop either. They will work, but it doesn't look like an upgrade to me....0 -
It's only £200 because it's last year's model, think they were about £300 or so full price.
I'm not going to bother with it, the spokes thing has put me off. I need to have a bike that's sturdy.
I'll stick with mine until it gets stolen, I think (which it is bound to, I've had four or five stolen now).0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards