We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Filling up ... full tank vs half tank

nicolax
nicolax Posts: 298 Forumite
was having this conversation with a friend the other night, wandered if anyone knew the actual answer

i have a friend who will always half fill his tank when going to get petrol, and going more often, as he says that above half a tank is extra weight in the car so costs more as the car needs to use more petrol to drag the weight (IYKWIM)

i, however, fill mine to the top (as long i have the money to!) as my arguement was that although it may cost slightly more to carry the extra weight, the petrol price will also go up by the time i next fill up, so im buying more at the lower price

does anyone know which is more cost-effective - filling up to the top, or to half fill the tank?

thanks in advance!

(especially helpful since work have now cut our sunday premium pay so im down quite a bit each month now!)
«13456

Comments

  • KierNet
    KierNet Posts: 2,775 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Either way it will be pennys that you are saving, seems too much effort.
    What is pi? Where did it come from?
  • rictus123
    rictus123 Posts: 2,560 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker Name Dropper
    I fill right up as saves alot of trips to the petrol station. As above, lot of effort for simular outcome
    Work in progress...Update coming July 2012.
  • ElkyElky
    ElkyElky Posts: 2,459 Forumite
    The petrol you'd waste going back and forth to the station would make it totally pointless filling only half a tank.
    We’ve had to remove your signature. Please check the Forum Rules if you’re unsure why it’s been removed and, if still unsure, email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • of course your car will use more fuel pulling the extra 20 or 30 litres around. Its far more economical (on your wallet) to only partially fill up..Also there is a petrol station on a main road I travel along every day so trips back and forth to the petrol station dont affect me.
  • reeac
    reeac Posts: 1,430 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    of course your car will use more fuel pulling the extra 20 or 30 litres around. Its far more economical (on your wallet) to only partially fill up..Also there is a petrol station on a main road I travel along every day so trips back and forth to the petrol station dont affect me.

    You're only talking about an extra 25 Kg. max. I challenge anyone to detect any effect on mpg. caused by that weight increase. Better to refuse to carry fat passengers.
  • If it's convenient to fill up like '89 it might make some difference - but your car probably weighs a metric tonne, so I can't see a few extra KG's make much of a difference... Could be better off going to the gym for the same effect!
  • JQ.
    JQ. Posts: 1,919 Forumite
    of course your car will use more fuel pulling the extra 20 or 30 litres around. Its far more economical (on your wallet) to only partially fill up..Also there is a petrol station on a main road I travel along every day so trips back and forth to the petrol station dont affect me.

    I don't think anybody's disputing that, but an extra 20 litres of fuel in something that weighs in excess of 1000kg is likely to make very little difference. Twice as many trips to a petrol station to save a couple of pence, personally my time is worth more than that to me.

    Are there any mathmeticians out there that can actually work out the actual cost saving of a petrol car with 35mpg, weighing 1,250Kg, and a tank capacity of 55 litres?
  • nicolax wrote: »
    was having this conversation with a friend the other night, wandered if anyone knew the actual answer

    i have a friend who will always half fill his tank when going to get petrol, and going more often, as he says that above half a tank is extra weight in the car so costs more as the car needs to use more petrol to drag the weight (IYKWIM)

    i, however, fill mine to the top (as long i have the money to!) as my arguement was that although it may cost slightly more to carry the extra weight, the petrol price will also go up by the time i next fill up, so im buying more at the lower price

    does anyone know which is more cost-effective - filling up to the top, or to half fill the tank?

    thanks in advance!

    (especially helpful since work have now cut our sunday premium pay so im down quite a bit each month now!)

    how much per month do you end up spending on petrol?
  • I think it's so marginal it's not even worth caring about. You're much better off checking your tyre pressures regularly and clearing things out of your car regularly (don't carry extra weight in your boot).
    Also, drive economically and keep everything topped up and maintained well instead.
    Learn how to do a simple service on your car and you'll save tons on garage labour costs & MOT failure... that's another big cost of car maintenance. There's lots of things you can fix yourself without putting it in a garage charging £££s.
  • DCFC79
    DCFC79 Posts: 40,610 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    reeac wrote: »
    You're only talking about an extra 25 Kg. max. I challenge anyone to detect any effect on mpg. caused by that weight increase. Better to refuse to carry fat passengers.


    or charge a fat tax
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 347.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 251.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 451.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 239.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 615.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 175.1K Life & Family
  • 252.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.