We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Japan crisis - the worlds economic outlook?
Comments
-
hardassets wrote: »With Chernobyl its now believed its well in to the millions died early as a result of cancer from radiation in the Western world.
Also completely untrue.0 -
hardassets wrote: »Japan especially has falling population. Expectations are millions will die early from cancer or other radiation causes over the next decade or so.
With Chernobyl its now believed its well in to the millions died early as a result of cancer from radiation in the Western world. But there is no way to prove these ones would not have died of cancer if Chernobyl never happened. But soon after Chernobyl the deaths from cancer in the affected regions has shot up.
Also as a result of Fukishema abortions are at the highest levels Japan has ever seen. I suppose if anyone in my family got pregnant near to such high levels of radioactive particles I would understand them aborting. Japan has a history of deformities as a result of radiation from WW2.
Is there a reason you took what a wrote on another thread entirely and took it out of context?
Do you have an data to support the above or are we just supposed to accept this supposition?0 -
Is there a reason you took what a wrote on another thread entirely and took it out of context?
Do you have an data to support the above or are we just supposed to accept this supposition?
http://www.ufodigest.com
There might be some hard data from this well respected source.0 -
0
-
Oh hello, 'hardassets' is back with a new username. It's so hard to keep up with these sockies. :rotfl:0
-
RenovationMan wrote: »Oh hello, 'hardassets' is back with a new username. It's so hard to keep up with these sockies. :rotfl:
I would laugh but I cant be bothered but I will tell you from my end you look like an idiot because you are wrong.
Kind Regards0 -
Time to stockpile beans, toilet roll and dogs again :eek:I think....0
-
So I've just seen this and thought to myself, that looks like the map of the debris field and how it spread. Perhaps they're related?
Sure enough it is just a map of "where free floating material (fish larvae, algae, phytoplankton, zooplankton...) present in the sea water near the damaged Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power station plant could have gone since the earthquake on March 11th. THIS IS NOT A REPRESENTATION OF THE RADIOACTIVE PLUME CONCENTRATION. "
They are trying to track radioactive biomass but it's not quite as exciting when you look into it eh?0 -
-
Quick question for the hysterical posters on this thread. Where are all the dead people? Surely there must be 10,000s of dead people by now, it's more than a year after the earthquake struck.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards