We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
How many of the people who compain about bankers bonuses could do the job themselves?
Comments
-
Bear in mind that for every trade there is normally a winner and a loser. Which do you think you would be?
It appears to me that they all managed to lose, astonishingly, given there obvious astounding quality and calibre of these people. Of course Fred the Shred, and his ilk actually "won" financially though they "lost" with horrific social and economic consequences.
Given that I am the one bailing them out, I would suggest I must be the "winner" and they must be the "losers".
Nice pathetic personal attack by the way, very "winner" of you.0 -
-
What rubbish.
So if I'm a surgeon and I 'win' when performing an operation, the patient 'loses'?
Get a grip.
Bad analogy.
The situation would be more like this:
You are a surgeon and your patient needs a new heart.
Another surgeon also has a patient that needs a new heart.
There is only one suitable heart available and you use you influence, and negotiating skill to get the heart for your patient.
Your patient and yourself are the winners.
The other surgeon and his patient are the losers.
See what I mean now.0 -
I guess you meant trade as in transaction, not profession?
That's the trouble with the English language...and analogies
. Open to interpretation. 0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards