We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

SNAD refund help (seller)

2

Comments

  • Crowqueen
    Crowqueen Posts: 5,726 Forumite
    edited 5 March 2011 at 11:06AM
    chancesare wrote: »
    The buyer has 45 days from date of purchase to file a claim, but as a seller, you should be doing all you can to avoid a claim as they dent your seller status.

    When the item is returned, you must refund the entire original payment. It is up to you if you chose to reimburse the returns postage - but you should if it is faulty, (if you are a business seller you should have this info on your listings, clearly giving details on who pays). Or chose not to have the item returned. But that is your decision and not one Paypal can force.
    Just to clarify, on faulty goods business sellers have to refund return postage on faulty or not-as-described items; writing in terms and conditions only applies to returns on goods that aren't faulty.

    OP - it's reasonable, if it's your mistake, to refund return postage as well. Buyers shouldn't really be out of pocket, and you shouldn't really demand a buyer returns an item tracked if you didn't send it out tracked and intend to honour the refund without being forced to by Paypal.

    That makes it not worth the buyer's while, so not surprised they are upset.
    "Well, it's election year, Bill, we'd rather people didn't exercise common sense..." - Jed Bartlet, The West Wing, season 4

    Am now Crowqueen, MRes (Law) - on to the PhD!
  • mikey72
    mikey72 Posts: 14,680 Forumite
    kurgon wrote: »
    mikey72 - I have no idea what you are saying. The postage being discussed is the cost to return the item to the seller.

    You need to read up on paypal.
  • Crowqueen
    Crowqueen Posts: 5,726 Forumite
    By the way, Kurgon, I would never say that to a buyer: (a) RD doesn't insure the item properly anyway, so it's not less likely to turn up at your end than if it's posted normal post; and (b) if you really meant that you wouldn't refund if it wasn't sent back recorded because how could you prove you received it, I would neg good and hard, trash your DSRs and file a dispute. I may not get all my money back, I may be left out of pocket, but it would make it ten times worse for you as it would threaten your seller performance more significantly than if you agreed to a refund with return postage in the first place.

    I think it's really unfair to treat a buyer that way over something you sold them that doesn't work.
    "Well, it's election year, Bill, we'd rather people didn't exercise common sense..." - Jed Bartlet, The West Wing, season 4

    Am now Crowqueen, MRes (Law) - on to the PhD!
  • mikey72
    mikey72 Posts: 14,680 Forumite
    Crowqueen wrote: »
    By the way, Kurgon, I would never say that to a buyer: (a) RD doesn't insure the item properly anyway, so it's not less likely to turn up at your end than if it's posted normal post; and (b) if you really meant that you wouldn't refund if it wasn't sent back recorded because how could you prove you received it, I would neg good and hard, trash your DSRs and file a dispute. I may not get all my money back, I may be left out of pocket, but it would make it ten times worse for you as it would threaten your seller performance more significantly than if you agreed to a refund with return postage in the first place.

    I think it's really unfair to treat a buyer that way over something you sold them that doesn't work.

    This is why ebay has to be seen to show ebay is safe for buyers, and why they improved the buyer protection to an acceptable level.
  • macfly
    macfly Posts: 2,728 Forumite
    And just to clarify - this is a private seller, not business, clearly stated.
    Why would he not do an INR if he's a scammer? Because disputes are recorded by both ebay and paypal and could flag your account as a problem. If he's doing it fairly often, he won't want to go through the process.
    What I always do for relatively cheap items is ask for them to be returned the cheapest way, with the sender getting proof of postage. If it goes missing, on receipt of the POF, I refund the lot and make the claim myself.
  • kurgon
    kurgon Posts: 877 Forumite
    mikey72 wrote: »
    You need to read up on paypal.
    You need to read the post!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • Crowqueen
    Crowqueen Posts: 5,726 Forumite
    mikey72 wrote: »
    This is why ebay has to be seen to show ebay is safe for buyers, and why they improved the buyer protection to an acceptable level.
    Good :) - just the way it should be.
    "Well, it's election year, Bill, we'd rather people didn't exercise common sense..." - Jed Bartlet, The West Wing, season 4

    Am now Crowqueen, MRes (Law) - on to the PhD!
  • Crowqueen
    Crowqueen Posts: 5,726 Forumite
    macfly wrote: »
    And just to clarify - this is a private seller, not business, clearly stated.
    Why would he not do an INR if he's a scammer? Because disputes are recorded by both ebay and paypal and could flag your account as a problem. If he's doing it fairly often, he won't want to go through the process.
    What I always do for relatively cheap items is ask for them to be returned the cheapest way, with the sender getting proof of postage. If it goes missing, on receipt of the POF, I refund the lot and make the claim myself.

    That sounds reasonable.

    As a private seller, you are not forced to refund return postage, but it's become accepted to do so as it means a buyer, inconvenienced by something that's ultimately your responsibility to check as a seller, is not out of pocket.

    If the buyer just doesn't like the item, then you are not obliged to refund return postage, but I just put a blanket 14-day no quibble return policy with return postage included, because (a) I've never yet had to honour it, and (b) it makes people more likely to contact you if they have a problem rather than go straight to dispute.

    In my entire eBay career, I've never had a dispute raised against me.
    "Well, it's election year, Bill, we'd rather people didn't exercise common sense..." - Jed Bartlet, The West Wing, season 4

    Am now Crowqueen, MRes (Law) - on to the PhD!
  • terra_ferma
    terra_ferma Posts: 5,484 Forumite
    Crowqueen wrote: »
    If the buyer just doesn't like the item, then you are not obliged to refund return postage, but I just put a blanket 14-day no quibble return policy with return postage included, because (a) I've never yet had to honour it, and (b) it makes people more likely to contact you if they have a problem rather than go straight to dispute.

    In my entire eBay career, I've never had a dispute raised against me.

    I soooooooooooooo agree!
    All the fuss in this post because someone dares to complain about an item the have received.
    Obviously us sellers only send out items in perfect conditions, never make mistakes, and have absolute faith in Royal Mail to deliver them in perfect condition!

    Ebay should permanently ban any buyer who dares to disagree and demands not to be worse off by having to pay return postage.

    CQ I have the same policy, the only point I don't agree is about asking to send with tracked method. That's what PayPal/ebay would state and the last thing I want is an argument because I have not received what they sent and they don't believe me. This doesn't mean I would scam if they don't do it.
    But if I've made a mistake, or item is SNAD that would be on me anyway.
  • pinkshoes
    pinkshoes Posts: 20,609 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Why is it not as described?? I'm thinking perhaps they watched it and want to send it back?!

    Personally I'd just tell them to send it back normal postage (not recorded), and you'll give them a (full) refund when you get it back. What's the 25p for though?
    Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
    Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')

    No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.