What is the New World Order?

julieq

And Barry Goldwater saying something - if it's an authentic quote at all - doesn't make it true. He had no special knowledge. And given he was in a position of power and influence throughout his career, why didn't he make more of it if it worried him?

julieq

smeagold wrote: »

The objective of the NWO is the creation of a one world government one world bank, one world currency as stated by those who are engineering it(quoted above)

Is there evidence we are moving in that direction? where national sovereignty is being superceeded by international law? are there moves to replace the dollar as the reserve currency and replace it with SDRs a global reserve currency? Is there a world bank? the answer to all these questions is yes.

OK, let's accept those assertions on face value for the sake of maintaining focus, though you can quibble with all of them on detail.

How does this lead to slavery of the population and the dominance of an elite?

Kohoutek

smeagold wrote: »

Is there evidence we are moving in that direction? where national sovereignty is being superceeded by international law?.

No evidence whatsoever.

smeagold wrote: »

are there moves to replace the dollar as the reserve currency and replace it with SDRs a global reserve currency?

That would be a good idea, it would solve the Triffin dilemma.

smeagold wrote: »

Is there a world bank?

Yes, the World Bank.

julieq

Shhh, let him proceed to his conclusions before we demolish the pillars of his argument

cgk1

julieq wrote: »

And Barry Goldwater saying something - if it's an authentic quote at all - doesn't make it true. He had no special knowledge. And given he was in a position of power and influence throughout his career, why didn't he make more of it if it worried him?

Compare and contrast:

The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power political, monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical. What the Trilateral Commission intends is to create a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nationstates involved. As managers and creators of the system, they will rule the future."

The actual quote:

In my view, the Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power: political, monetary, intellectual, and ecclesiastical. All this is to be done in the interest of creating a more peaceful, more productive world community.

What the Trilateralists truly intend is the creation of a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nation-states involved. They believe the abundant materialism they propose to create will overwhelm existing differences. As managers and creators of the system they will rule the future."

So at least two quotes have been changed - odd practice for someone who believes in the 'truth'.

chris180682

The main problem here is that as soon as someone mentions the word "conspiracy" they are instantly labelled as nutters or gullable when there are many, many consipracies which have serious credibility and logic but obviously there are also conspiracies which are ridiculous. I've watched and read a fair few things on the New World Order subject and some of it is nonsense and just starts getting silly but some of it also makes logical sense. I have certainly learned quite a bit of how the world is run from this but a lot of the "revelations" are just logical common sense when you actually think about it, not really consipracy. I feel it's just the fact that most peole don't bother to pay any attention to who's REALLY running what and how so when these things are "exposed" they seem over sensational or even daft but things such as the economy and the banks have been run by pretty much the same people in pretty much the same way since the beginning. The fact is that there is enough about the real world and how things are run that is scary without it being sensationalised with talk of lizards, etc like some do. But then there is another theory on that regarding who puts out the ridiculous theories and is it an effort to discredit good, logocal theories, you could go on forever....

smeagold

Following the 2009 G20 summit, plans were announced for implementing the creation of a new global currency to replace the US dollar’s role as the world reserve currency. Point 19 of the communiqu! released by the G20 at the end of the Summit stated, “We have agreed to support a general SDR allocation which will inject $250 billion into the world economy and increase global liquidity.” SDRs, or Special Drawing Rights, are “a synthetic paper currency issued by the International Monetary Fund.”

As the Telegraph reported, “the G20 leaders have activated the IMF’s power to create money and begin global ‘quantitative easing’. In doing so, they are putting a de facto world currency into play. It is outside the control of any sovereign body. Conspiracy theorists will love it.”1

The article continued in stating that, “there is now a world currency in waiting. In time, SDRs are likely to evolve into a parking place for the foreign holdings of central banks, led by the People’s Bank of China.” Further, “the creation of a Financial Stability Board looks like the first step towards a global financial regulator,” or, in other words, a global central bank.

the rest of the article is here and worth reading:

http://newdawnmagazine.com.au/Article/A_Global_Central_Bank_Global_Currency_World_Government.html

chris180682

julieq wrote: »

OK, let's accept those assertions on face value for the sake of maintaining focus, though you can quibble with all of them on detail.

How does this lead to slavery of the population and the dominance of an elite?

Isn't there already a domination of the elite and always has been? That's capitalism.

julieq

I know of no conspiracy theories that haven't been fully debunked. But can we stick to the NWO here, or we'll be off into all sorts of weeds.

julieq

So I repeat, how does this lead to mass slavery?