We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
100 year old grannioe being asked to repay £17k
Comments
-
Firstly get help the aged involved straight away, this is exactly what there here for, in situations where the elderly may be punished for not being able to follow such a convoluted benefits system. .
I very much doubt that Help the Aged would see their raison d'etre as helping people avoid paying what they owe, particularly when they have property which is likely to be realisable sooner rather than later.0 -
Just a thought, if they had been known about the sdp ending surely they would have been able to claim carrers allowance (had a different name but still existed). Perhaps they could offset what could have been paid against what was to reduce the overpayment?
I would doubt you will be able to find a recording or transcript of the call. When I finished at the DWP just a few years ago we still didn't have our calls recorded or monitored although many centralised benefits did. Anything over about 5 years ago is highly unlikely to have be recorded, unless a note was made somewhere on either the paperwork or online and has been kept
ali x
1) different person would be getting paid carers so offset can not be done
2) depends on the beneft and which office they spoke to but calls can be traced and listened to0 -
1) different person would be getting paid carers so offset can not be done
2) depends on the beneft and which office they spoke to but calls can be traced and listened to
Anmarj I assumed it would be the uncle who claimed the CA, but as you say being 2 separate claimants probably stops that idea.
You are right about number 2, all I was saying is basically the same thing. Just that they can't bank on the calls having been recorded, where for many big companies/ banks etc it is usual for all calls to be recorded although not always kept for long periods).
I would say its worth a data protection request to look at everything held, something may support the OP's position.
ali x"Overthinking every little thing
Acknowledge the bell you cant unring"0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards