We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
January Nationwide MoM -0.1% YoY -1.1%
Comments
-
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »Really? Show me all these people on a 0.5% mortgage....
Base rate dear boy, base rate. You really need to pay more attention to what other people write.HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »AVerage wages have increased every year since 2007. And continue to do so today.
Apart from the millions who are on a public sector pay freeze for two years. Again, pay attention to what is written before you spout horse !!!!!!.HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »At the 2007 peak, with more expensive houses and base rates approaching 6%, it was 45% of after tax income. Still far cheaper than when our generation took out mortgages.
And your point is? 29% of disposable income where base rate is 0.5% and SVR is about 4%. When base rate rises to 3% and SVR to approx 7%, these millions of public sector folk who will not be getting a pay rise, but paying extra National Insurance will be paying almost double for their mortgage. 2 x 29% is a lot more than 45%.0 -
Can understand the denial, when the trend is starting to look more and more like the infamous graph.0
-
martinbuckley wrote: »29% of disposable income where base rate is 0.5% and SVR is about 4%. When base rate rises to 3% and SVR to approx 7%, these millions of public sector folk who will not be getting a pay rise, but paying extra National Insurance will be paying almost double for their mortgage. 2 x 29% is a lot more than 45%
29% is for new buyers, FTB's.....
The figure for existing mortgage holders, like those "millions of public sector workers" is significantly lower.pay attention to what is written before you spout horse !!!!!!.
Indeed....“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote:Really? Show me all these people on a 0.5% mortgage....
I know one or two... possibly even a few. One colleague of mine is on a tracker of base rate minus something like 1 or 0.5%.
In the office, I heard her mouthily gob off with "INTEREST RATES HAVE GONE DOWN? REALLY?! THAT IS GOOD NEWS. THAT MEANS I'VE LITERALLY, LIKE, GOT NO MORTGAGE!!"wherediditallgothen wrote: »You don't read too well do you? What happens when base rate goes up?
The message from the government was plain to see... LABOUR SAYS: those who save can get f**ked.Long live the faces of t'wunty.0 -
if you look at the 3 month on the 3 month figure is back on an upward trend, soon to stagnating... You dont have to like it or accept it, its just the way it is.
When earnings start to rise due to higher than expected inflation, so too will house prices.
What I dont understand is everyone on here is going on about the high inflation, high inflation, But none of you are realising what is going to happen in the future, even if we curb inflation, wages still have to play some sort of catchup, and when this happens, affordability will be eased and house prices will be the first to bounce.
I take it you didn't read Mervyn Kings speech last week then?0 -
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »29% is for new buyers, FTB's.....
The figure for existing mortgage holders, like those "millions of public sector workers" is significantly lower.
Indeed....
Assuming that they've been following a repayment mortgage. If they've mewed or are on interest only......0 -
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »Mortgage payments for FTB's now at just 29% of after tax income, versus 68% in 1990.
Gosh, it must be miserable paying half the amount our generation had to for housing.... And having all the benefits of mostly everything else being cheaper and better as well.
I wonder how they cope.....;)
Indeed.....
evidence?
assuming the average first time buyers house has a mortgage of 100k (low I know) this would mean a mortgage of around what £600? Meaning a take home pay of £2k meaning a salary of £30k minimum.
So the average first time buyer with a mortgage of 60% of average house price is on 5k more than the average salary?
Yeh Right.0 -
Derbyshire
That would seem unfortunate for you.
Average prices are 13.4% lower than peak in Derbyshire.
Of course it depends on your property, type, location etc and could be far lower than the average, with other areas fareing far better.
To get 40% lower when the average is only 13.4% lower does not bode well in my opinion.:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
Was the 1990 BOE IR around 13%, so yes as a FTB I will be looking at around 6% (way above base, but anyway) what was the average mortgage rate when IR's where 13%, even if the mortgage is matching the BOE rate it will still cost a lot more.
Also what incomes are you using, is it average household? average single wage or average joint wage.
I don't think we have an apples to apples comparison here.
I was paying 15.4% in 1990.'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0 -
bingobob777 wrote: »evidence?
assuming the average first time buyers house has a mortgage of 100k (low I know) this would mean a mortgage of around what £600? Meaning a take home pay of £2k meaning a salary of £30k minimum.
So the average first time buyer with a mortgage of 60% of average house price is on 5k more than the average salary?
Yeh Right.
On a mortgage of 100k there is no reason for the mortgage payment to be that high... at 4% more like £530pm so more like 28k earnings needed. The total housing costs would be more like 800 per month with most bills, still leaving them 1k to survive (oh no this is the end of the world), each 1% increase in Base should they be tracking will result in £57 increase in mortgage. They dont think this year will even be more than 0.75% in total... so thats probably £40 quid per annum increase if we get rising rates but it will more than likely be fixed for between 2-5 years anyway. A 2% payrise will just about cover that each year (average wage growth currently). So fix for 5 years, after 5 years it will still cover a 4% jump in base rates easily when your remortgage or revert to SVR. Spending will be curbed... but it wont be the end of the world.
FTBers are not people who just left school, they are on average 35 year olds. Most of them probably earn OVER 30k and middle managers.Plan
1) Get most competitive Lifetime Mortgage (Done)
2) Make healthy savings, spend wisely (Doing)
3) Ensure healthy pension fund - (Doing)
4) Ensure house is nice, suitable, safe, and located - (Done)
5) Keep everyone happy, healthy and entertained (Done, Doing, Going to do)0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards