We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Statement of reasons and points of law

1…5791011

Comments

  • Jock221
    Jock221 Posts: 160 Forumite
    dmg24 wrote: »
    Yep, that is correct, but you are looking for errors of law, not errors of fact. The Tribunal are not infallible, they can make mistakes, but they are rare. You would benefit from a specialist helping with this - it is something I would struggle with, and I deal with disability law full time.

    Have you every cone across any errors of law?
  • celinepatricia
    celinepatricia Posts: 443 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    sh1305 wrote: »
    An appeal is a tribunal. You can have a reconsideration before an appeal.

    So how come we had an appeal which was turned down, tribunal date set for April (sometime) but due to medical evidence has now been passed as in the work related group.

    By the way thanks for your apology for suggesting that a terminally ill person should get a job, he actually should be in the support group but after the fight weve had I think I will just leave things as they are now!
  • Indie_Kid
    Indie_Kid Posts: 23,100 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    You never said that he was terminally ill. If he was, he should've got the support group component from the start of his claim.
    Sealed pot challenge #232. Gold stars from Sue-UU - :staradmin :staradmin £75.29 banked
    50p saver #40 £20 banked
    Virtual sealed pot #178 £80.25
  • celinepatricia
    celinepatricia Posts: 443 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    sh1305 wrote: »
    You never said that he was terminally ill. If he was, he should've got the support group component from the start of his claim.

    Exactly, so why have we had to fight and he still isnt in the group he should be. Look back and read posts 29 & 25.
  • dmg24
    dmg24 Posts: 33,920 Forumite
    10,000 Posts
    Jock221 wrote: »
    Have you every cone across any errors of law?

    Personally I have not, but there is case law where they have been found. I'll have a quick look now, but may need to get back to you on that.
    sh1305 wrote: »
    You never said that he was terminally ill. If he was, he should've got the support group component from the start of his claim.

    Ignore her sh1305, all cp seems to want to do is distract other peoples threads (and you are, of course, correct). ;)
    Gone ... or have I?
  • celinepatricia
    celinepatricia Posts: 443 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    dmg24 wrote: »

    Ignore her sh1305, all cp seems to want to do is distract other peoples threads (and you are, of course, correct). ;)

    You are absolutely disgusting, just because you cannt get the better of me because I have been through the system fighting for my husbands rights because he is terminally ill you tell somebody to ignore me.. SHAME ON YOU.
  • dmg24
    dmg24 Posts: 33,920 Forumite
    10,000 Posts
    Here are some recent cases, you will see that some challenges are based perceived procedural irregularities, and some on the Tribunal's interpretation of the word of the law.
    Gone ... or have I?
  • dmg24
    dmg24 Posts: 33,920 Forumite
    10,000 Posts
    celinepatricia wrote: »
    You are absolutely disgusting, just because you cannt get the better of me because I have been through the system fighting for my husbands rights because he is terminally ill you tell somebody to ignore me.. SHAME ON YOU.

    Shame on me for correcting you when you give out incorrect information? The reason you have to fight is because you are dealing with something that you do not understand, but you refuse to accept that you are wrong.
    Gone ... or have I?
  • celinepatricia
    celinepatricia Posts: 443 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    Why dont you just tell me what point you are trying to make rather than me trawl through all the cases that you have highlighted.
  • dmg24
    dmg24 Posts: 33,920 Forumite
    10,000 Posts
    celinepatricia wrote: »
    Why dont you just tell me what point you are trying to make rather than me trawl through all the cases that you have highlighted.

    The cases are for Jock221, as this is his thread, and he asked me for examples.
    Gone ... or have I?
This discussion has been closed.
★ ★ ★ Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.
Update Your Picture