We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Our tenants have done a runner!!!!!!!!!!
Comments
-
i seem to recall that this case ruled that emergency entry was for serious health and safety issues only - such as possible electric/gas/water emergencies and then a landlord had the right to enter to prevent injury/further emergency.0
-
"never" is nonsense !!!
a landlord could endanger other neighbours lives if he did not arrange for forcible entry to a property if the gas had been left on for example.
Since landlords are now responsible for tenants behaviour - the law cannot have it both ways - we are responsible, yet not allowed in to prevent further damage/possible injury ??? how insane is that ?????
i would forcibly enter in those circumstances and argue my case in court later on if necessary.0 -
This access to meters thing interests me. We have got an issue in work regarding whether we should ask landlords to relocate meters which are in bedrooms. We might in future be asking for meters to be moved to the common parts as a condition of HMO licensing.
I don't know if we need to do it, or even if we are able to, but it is under discussion.0 -
prudryden wrote:That is my understanding from reading all sorts of material, as well. Sparky has indicated (if I read that right) that he has found a source that basically says never. I would like to read this source for myself.
I found this in a law magazine, so no web link I'm afraid... I could try and scan it and emailing it to you if that's any help. There's no cases mentioned though. I get the hint that you want to gain entry to a property but aren't sure whether you can or not...? I don't think its quite as strong as never, but definately getting that way - I would probably guess only immediate risk to life or property would justify (bearing in mind that gas safety inspections don't come under this, and recent news events only go to prove how necessary they are...)
PM me if you want any further info?
PS I'm a she!0 -
Sparky67 wrote:I found this in a law magazine, so no web link I'm afraid... I could try and scan it and emailing it to you if that's any help. There's no cases mentioned though. I get the hint that you want to gain entry to a property but aren't sure whether you can or not...? I don't think its quite as strong as never, but definately getting that way - I would probably guess only immediate risk to life or property would justify (bearing in mind that gas safety inspections don't come under this, and recent news events only go to prove how necessary they are...)
PM me if you want any further info?
PS I'm a she!
Many thanks for the offer, but not necessary. It would probably come down to contract law vs. trespass law. More importantly, spirit of the law vs. letter of the law. Too many variables.FREEDOM IS NOT FREE0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards