📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Trying to fit 84 minutes on 80 minute disc

13»

Comments

  • poppy10_2
    poppy10_2 Posts: 6,588 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    You could convert the tracks to mp3 which should make them smaller then burn to disc as data if your music system plays them.
    They are already MP3s, he downloaded them from Amazon.
    Compress the songs ever so slightly with Goldwave?? The loss in quality will be negligible over all the tracks.
    'Compressing' the MP3s will make absoultely no difference to the size of the burned audio CD.
    poppy10
  • DCFC79
    DCFC79 Posts: 40,641 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 2 January 2011 at 2:52PM
    besides leaving out a track, you could also try removing the 2 second gap between tracks, every little bit helps :)


    i tried making the gaps between songs and it didnt make much difference well i chnage it from 8 secs to 4 secs and ddnt make a difference but ill give 2 seconds a try
  • DatabaseError
    DatabaseError Posts: 4,161 Forumite
    dcfx79, not too sure where the 8 second gap is?
    between each audio track there is a default 2 second gap, which can be removed using most software, with 20 tracks that's gonna be 38 seconds saved (or 36?) certainly enough to care about when overburning, as you're writing data to parts of the disk that really aren't meant to be written to on the outer edge of the disk. Generally tracks fade out so the lack of gap shouldn't be noticeable.
    Utinam logica falsa tuam philosophiam totam suffodiant.
  • Andy_L
    Andy_L Posts: 13,033 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Why not burn it over 2 discs? I suspect that's what you'd have got if you'd bought the CD rather than a download.
  • aliEnRIK
    aliEnRIK Posts: 17,741 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    I wouldnt ever suggest 'over burn'
    Even if it worked (Which I doubt at 4mins extra), it wont do your drive any good at all
    :idea:
  • jbreckmckye
    jbreckmckye Posts: 241 Forumite
    edited 5 January 2011 at 1:53AM
    Overburn is fine, but reduces compatibility with older readers.

    Overburn works by changing the way 'navigation' data (that aids the reader) is recorded. Specifically, the burner creates data for the entire discs rather than each track, using DAO rather than TAO mode. You can fit more data onto your disc, but some readers (particularly old CD players and drives) will have trouble reading them.
  • Another idea; rather than drop one track completely, you could use Audacity to fade each one 15 seconds earlier than normal. Most pop songs outstay their welcome anyway!

    Less good for music, but OK for long spoken word tracks; you can use Audacity again to speed up the track slightly.
    I'm dreaming of a white Christmas.
    But, if the white runs out, I'll drink the red.

  • prowla
    prowla Posts: 14,027 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Get an iPod and an adapter and put that in the car?
    (If you car has a cassette player, I have one of those earplu to cassette adapters you can have.)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.