We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
CRB and occassional helper forms
Comments
-
I would really hate to be as cynical as some posters on this forum.
My friend did pay for his groceries, he wouldn't dream of not doing so. He has never been to court before in his life, he was worried, scared, stressed and that made him ill, he just wanted it over and done with and didn't think of any other consequences. He doesn't have close family to turn to and I advised as best I could as a friend as did the solicitor but he just wanted it finished.
I'm not belittling conditions like dementia but it's not up to me to post his life in detail here, I just wanted some advice regarding the 'occasional helper form' and if it was the same as a CRB.0 -
How can he be sure he did pay if he is confused?0
-
wrong: it depends on the people looking at his form.bristol_pilot wrote: »He will not be able to do anything with young people for a very long time.
He plays occasionally for productions. He does not, presumably, work alone with any children or young people.worriedandconfused wrote: »Will a shoplifting charge really stop him working with the drama group?
frankly, I'd question whether they actually needed to do a crb check on him but I'm to tired to read up on their site.
he needs to say on the form that he has a conviction, in his place I would ask who gets to see the forms (and it should only be one person, not the entire committee) and talk to them in confidence. if it were me I'd be happy for him to continue.Signature removed for peace of mind0 -
wrong: it depends on the people looking at his form.
He plays occasionally for productions. He does not, presumably, work alone with any children or young people.
frankly, I'd question whether they actually needed to do a crb check on him but I'm to tired to read up on their site.
he needs to say on the form that he has a conviction, in his place I would ask who gets to see the forms (and it should only be one person, not the entire committee) and talk to them in confidence. if it were me I'd be happy for him to continue.
Yes he'd need to do a CRB when working with students, there could also be vulnerable adults (sever learning difficulty, disabilities) in the group as well. There is something of the paranoia about it but also some sense - as there would be an opportunity to strike up friendships with the students, invite them to meet outside the venue, get them to his home ...
What I can't believe no one has picked up is why he wasn't done for littering, if innocent of shoplifting then he was guilty of littering
As others have said it's up to the group and their policy with convictions.Santander are awful - mission in life is to warn people since 17-Sep-10, 18-Sep-10 realised one of thousands.0 -
true, as I should have realised from the old Midsomer Murder I was watching the other day ...AnonymousForObviousReason wrote: »Yes he'd need to do a CRB when working with students, there could also be vulnerable adults (sever learning difficulty, disabilities) in the group as well. There is something of the paranoia about it but also some sense - as there would be an opportunity to strike up friendships with the students, invite them to meet outside the venue, get them to his home ...
:rotfl: shades of Alice's Restaurant ...AnonymousForObviousReason wrote: »What I can't believe no one has picked up is why he wasn't done for littering, if innocent of shoplifting then he was guilty of littering
let's hope they're sane ...AnonymousForObviousReason wrote: »As others have said it's up to the group and their policy with convictions.Signature removed for peace of mind0 -
Never heard of Alice's Restaurant before, getting a cup of tea to watch on youtube now.Santander are awful - mission in life is to warn people since 17-Sep-10, 18-Sep-10 realised one of thousands.0
-
oh enjoy!!!Signature removed for peace of mind0
-
Why didn't he just go back into the store and back to the till where he had paid for the goods. They would have recognised him and sorted it all out in no time. Unfortunately it will be revealed when he does the CRB. If you are innocent why on earth would you admit to something you didn't do?0
-
Why didn't he just go back into the store and back to the till where he had paid for the goods. They would have recognised him and sorted it all out in no time. Unfortunately it will be revealed when he does the CRB. If you are innocent why on earth would you admit to something you didn't do?
Couldnt agree with you more !
This is exactly what i said in post three of this thread. Seems to me s though there could be more to this story than meets the eye.
Surely once the old boy was taken in by the police and questioned , the police had the common sense to go back to the store to investigate ? If they didnt then that says a lot .The loopy one has gone :j0 -
was there any CCTV is the store?Mad Mum to 3 wonderful children, 2 foster kittens and 2 big fat cats that never made it to a new home!
Aiming to loose 56 pounds this year. Total to date 44.5 pounds 12.5 to go. Slimming World Rocks!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.2K Spending & Discounts
- 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards