We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Rubbish Ringgo ?
Comments
-
How does the TOC come in to this one? To be honest, how does NCP either? Surely RingGo is at fault?
Neil, if you do chose to sue all and sundry, make surely you hire a good barrack room lawyer.
NCP issued an invoice when the OP had paid. The TOC contracted NCP. They are both liable.0 -
NCP only have to hand the info that RingGo supply, and given that the PPC person that issued the ticket would have tapped in a code to his machine thingy for that particular car park, it would register as not having paid (unless I'm getting the wrong end of the stick here?).Sir_Roger_deLodger wrote: »NCP issued an invoice when the OP had paid. The TOC contracted NCP. They are both liable.
To hold the TOC jointly liable is nothing more than utter tripe. I didn't study law for four years many moons back, but I'm sure that theory would be laughed out of court.0 -
You don't need a lawyer for a small claim, just a good argument, well he's paid, that would be good enough, the fact that ncp has turned down the appeal (so appeal), then issue them and the landowner who probably is the TOC a letter before action, when they ignore that issue them court papers covering the ticket, the cost of action and a small amount for your time.
You will win, but how valuable is your time? Is it worth doing it ?Excel Parking, MET Parking, Combined Parking Solutions, VP Parking Solutions, ANPR PC Ltd, & Roxburghe Debt Collectors. What do they all have in common?
They are all or have been suspended from accessing the DVLA database for gross misconduct!
Do you really need to ask what kind of people run parking companies?0 -
To hold the TOC jointly liable is nothing more than utter tripe. I didn't study law for four years many moons back, but I'm sure that theory would be laughed out of court.
The landowner has been held to be jointly liable many times in clamping cases, as you will find out if you do a search on this forum, CAG or Pepipoo.
You are entitled to your opinion, I am entitled to mine. Sorry I am not going to enter into an argument with you. It is up to the OP to read all the advice here and make his own mind up.0 -
The land owner would probably be Network Rail then.Sir_Roger_deLodger wrote: »The landowner has been held to be jointly liable many times in clamping cases, as you will find out if you do a search on this forum, CAG or Pepipoo.
You are entitled to your opinion, I am entitled to mine. Sorry I am not going to enter into an argument with you. It is up to the OP to read all the advice here and make his own mind up.
That's the problem here, opinions don't count, and are not as important as facts. 0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards