We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Solar PV

2

Comments

  • Cardew
    Cardew Posts: 29,064 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Rampant Recycler
    WTPooh wrote: »
    All the rest seem to be saying I should be grateful with an ROI of 8-9% and that's it.

    b)there is an unwritten industry cartel of "give the customer a 9% ROI and they will be grateful".:mad:

    Without rehearsing all the discussions on the economics of PV systems, IMO we should be wary of talking about a ROI of x%.

    If I invest, say, £12k in a Bank I will always have that £12k available plus what low rate of interest I have earned.

    Invest £12k in a solar PV system and you have equipment on your roof!

    So you are not comparing 'like with like' It is not until the accrued savings(FIT etc) are more than the £12k(plus interest) in the bank are you 'in profit'.

    Personally I think buying a solar PV system is more like buying an annuity.

    Not arguing against buying these systems, as they will make money in the long term.
  • WTPooh
    WTPooh Posts: 10 Forumite
    Cardew - I agree, a depreciating physical asset generating income is not the same as a liquid cash asset generating income, however the term is used for normalising capital investments.

    I did point out to several of them that they had no idea what my ROI would be because they had no idea what my cost of borrowing was - and so it was imposible for them to quote me an ROI figure.

    Fortunately they were thick-skinned enough not to grasp that point or to realise that they were out of the bidding process by then, so they left amicably.

    For the sake of argument and avoiding nuanced detail I've left out the cost of funding (i.e. interest charged or savings interest lost) in the ROI quoted previously of about 8-9%
  • WTPooh wrote: »
    Equaliser123 - I'd be interested in the company quoting that for you. Looking for a similar specified system.

    .

    Green Project. Same people as behind Tesco and M&S but have gone direct with them.
  • WTPooh
    WTPooh Posts: 10 Forumite
    Green Project. Same people as behind Tesco and M&S but have gone direct with them.

    Interesting - My Tesco Quote came via the Mark Group,
    markgroup.co.uk

    I'll get the Green Project to quote too then !
    greenprojectuk.com

    Many thanks Equaliser123
  • zeupater
    zeupater Posts: 5,398 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 30 November 2010 at 1:26AM
    WTPooh wrote: »
    Interesting - My Tesco Quote came via the Mark Group,
    markgroup.co.uk

    I'll get the Green Project to quote too then !
    greenprojectuk.com

    Many thanks Equaliser123
    Hi

    You'll probably find that your Tesco Quote was by Enact & Mark Group were their sub-contractor. I believe that the Green Project are simply Enact's own brand for the same offering ... effectively taking Tesco out of the loop (more profit).

    I think that Equiliser123's price included a 10% discount which was on offer for a while a couple of months ago ?? (Equaliser123 ??/September ??) ..... last I heard was that the discount had been reduced to a fixed £500 and even that was withdrawn when all of the installers were trying to convince people to buy quickly in order to beat the 'rumoured' withdrawal of FiTs in the government's CSR ......

    HTH
    "We are what we repeatedly do, excellence then is not an act, but a habit. " ...... Aristotle
    B)
  • WTPooh wrote: »
    Interesting - My Tesco Quote came via the Mark Group,
    markgroup.co.uk

    I'll get the Green Project to quote too then !
    greenprojectuk.com

    Many thanks Equaliser123

    Yes, it is the Mark Group who will be doing the install.
  • zeupater wrote: »
    Hi

    You'll probably find that your Tesco Quote was by Enact & Mark Group were their sub-contractor. I believe that the Green Project are simply Enact's own brand for the same offering ... effectively taking Tesco out of the loop (more profit).

    I think that Equiliser123's price included a 10% discount which was on offer for a while a couple of months ago ?? (Equaliser123 ??/September ??) ..... last I heard was that the discount had been reduced to a fixed £500 and even that was withdrawn when all of the installers were trying to convince people to buy quickly in order to beat the 'rumoured' withdrawal of FiTs in the government's CSR ......

    HTH

    Absolutely right.
  • pretty expensive @ £9900
    especially as they have specified the wrong sma inverter
    either loss of yields ( outputs ) or could damage the inverter
    depending on how system is connected together
    inverters & modules must be co-ordinated together to offer
    best yields & ouputs and for electrical safety


    i assume 14 x sharp NU-E235E1 modules
    you need either a sma sunny boy
    SB3000HF-30 new transformer design for 2010
    SB3000TL-250 transformerless

    transformless offers best effciencies

    see www.sma.de download sunny design
    they only recommend 12 modules as a maximum

    both more effcient than older SB3800 & have bluetooth for wireless display or pc/iphone/web interface or dataloggers
    www.suntrol-portal.com & free apps on i-phones


    also sharp 235wp mono , not top end product anymore with only 14.3% module effciency . most new mono & poly modules
    offer better options these days to over 17%

    look at 2010 premium products from the likes of
    solarworld , kyocera , rec , sanyo , coenergy , aleo siliken etc
    some even have better warranties as well of power output over 25 years and some offer postive power tolerance
    they will better rated not +/- there rating eg 235Wp
    but at a min of 235Wp or higher
    if you are being charged per watt , make sure you are getting it

    might cost a bit more , but installation will be same
    will actually work out cheaper in the long run
    as will higher effciency modules & inverters will produce more
    yields therefore higher earnings over the next 25 years


    By way of example, we have ordered (install next week) 14 Sharp 235W panels (3.29 kwp) with an SMA 3800 inverter for £9,900.
  • kd235 much the same outputs as sharp 235wp
    both around 14% but poly modules work better
    in cloudy/overcast/diffuse light conditions in the uk
    but still will not work with SB3800 inverter

    They have since come back and said that they will now be using Kyocer KD235GH-2PB panels[/QUOTE]
  • Equaliser123
    Equaliser123 Posts: 3,404 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    daytona600 wrote: »
    pretty expensive @ £9900
    especially as they have specified the wrong sma inverter
    either loss of yields ( outputs ) or could damage the inverter
    depending on how system is connected together
    inverters & modules must be co-ordinated together to offer
    best yields & ouputs and for electrical safety

    Thanks, but after getting 7 quotes, this is by far the cheapest. Where do you suggest would be cheaper than £3.2k per kwp?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.