We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Mortgage lending slumps to £112m
Comments
-
pmsl - some people need to look at the definition of net lending
froth, froth, froth from the usual suspects
What's your take on it then?
I've just had a look at HPC, and their take seems to be pretty much the same...
http://www.housepricecrash.co.uk/forum/index.php?showtopic=153685&view=findpost&p=2766126
http://www.housepricecrash.co.uk/forum/index.php?showtopic=153685&view=findpost&p=2766072
Your take must be that britons are injecting MASSIVE amounts of overpayments? HUGE amounts suddenly.
Call it froth froth froth all you like. My take on that is you really don't like the figures.0 -
so you're saying that people redeeming mortgages and repayments isn't good for the housing market.... it's probably the reverse...You can spin it anwyay you like. This isnt good news for the housing market. And that is all that matters. Bye bye chucky
i think you need to have a little rethink sunshine, if not get yourself an economics text book - you may learn something...
froth on, froth on doire...0 -
Blacklight wrote: »A 90% drop would mean either, 90% less property sold (48,000 - 90% = 4,800) or a 90% drop in house prices.
Or more downsizers, more cash buyers etc.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »Your take must be that britons are injecting MASSIVE amounts of overpayments? HUGE amounts suddenly.
From the OP:a combination of a lack of activity in the property market and existing homeowners focusing on reducing their mortgage debt while interest rates remain low.0 -
if you want to know then answer you need to look at the gross lending figures - it will tell you what the average mortgage amount is.Graham_Devon wrote: »What's your take on it then?
I've just had a look at HPC, and their take seems to be pretty much the same...
http://www.housepricecrash.co.uk/forum/index.php?showtopic=153685&view=findpost&p=2766126
http://www.housepricecrash.co.uk/forum/index.php?showtopic=153685&view=findpost&p=2766072
Your take must be that britons are injecting MASSIVE amounts of overpayments? HUGE amounts suddenly.
we've been here before a few times... do we need to get the thread where it has been explained to you?0 -
-
pmsl - some people need to look at the definition of net lending
froth, froth, froth from the usual suspectsThe figures show a dramatic difference between recent months and the height of the property market boom in the autumn of 2007.
In September that year, net mortgage lending increased by £10bn, the second highest monthly figure on record. Three years on, net mortgage lending was about 1% of that, at £112m.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-11650909
toss, toss,toss from the forum bully!0 -
if you want to know then answer you need to look at the gross lending figures - it will tell you what the average mortgage amount is.
we've been here before a few times... do we need to get the thread where it has been explained to you?
Stop trying to pretend I don't understand.
This is a 90% drop. So either new lending is drying up, or suddenly people are injecting massive amounts into their mortgages.
You appear to be going with people suddenly injecting massive amounts into their mortgages. Fine.
I'm not suggesting only 700 new mortgages have been put through, just stating how small a figure that 112m is in housing terms.
Either way, it's not good, which is why your simply trying to make something of calling other people thick instead of focusing on the figures.0 -
for once i agree with you, not with the down sizers but regarding cash buyers.Graham_Devon wrote: »Or more downsizers, more cash buyers etc.
i reckon that about 30% of sales are currently cash buyers.
you probably no what that means don't you... Blacklight has touched on it on Post 17...0 -
jeez, i've agreed with you - it's because there are less mortgage transactions, more people repaying mortgage debt and more cash buyers.Graham_Devon wrote: »Stop trying to pretend I don't understand.
This is a 90% drop. So either new lending is drying up, or suddenly people are injecting massive amounts into their mortgages.
You appear to be going with people suddenly injecting massive amounts into their mortgages. Fine.
I'm not suggesting only 700 new mortgages have been put through, just stating how small a figure that 112m is in housing terms.
Either way, it's not good, which is why your simply trying to make something of calling other people thick instead of focusing on the figures.
i don't know if it's good or bad but suggesting looking at the gross lending figures to tell you if it's good or bad... net lending tells you very little.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards