We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

redundancy planning

Options
i am just about to be made redundant and i am thinking about buying another property with the savings i have as i am thinking if i do not find another job within 6 months the inland revenue can take into consideration my total savings and not give me full JSA
Although i am very fortunate to be in this position compared to other peoples circumstances, having not ventured into buying another property before does anyone think this is a good idea as it is a guaranteed purchase
Any help please ?

Comments

  • ALIBOBSY
    ALIBOBSY Posts: 4,527 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    For JSA income based purposes which I assume you are talking about (the contribution based jsa lasts the first 6 months), it is ALL capital not just savings so they would take a market rate tariff value for the second property against your benefits anyway.

    This assumes you are not just a troll aiming for another argument over who should and shouldn't get benefits. As far as the government rules (as well as common sense) goes, if you can afford a second property you cannot really expect the government to pay you benefits.

    ali x
    "Overthinking every little thing
    Acknowledge the bell you cant unring"

  • its not that i am after any gains, what i am trying to say is if i cannot find a job within 6 months they will take assets into account and start taking my savings for which i have worked hard for
    If i buy property and hopefully i could rent it out and maybe get a better income that way
    i appreciate i would not get full JSA but would it be better financially as ive been told you cannot go wrong with bricks and mortar and also intererst rates for savers is very poor
  • Ziggazee
    Ziggazee Posts: 464 Forumite
    Hmm....so you intend to deliberately deprive yourself of savings to get more benefits? To quote your original post "the inland revenue can take into consideration my total savings and not give me full JSA". This would make you nothing short of a benefits cheat. To hell with the rest of us taxpayers working hard to pay for those benefits eh! And people wonder why this country is in such a mess.
  • No i dont intend to delibrately cheat the system, hopefully i will get a job asap as i WILL be looking. Having worked for approx 28 years of possible 30 i have paid my stamps,tax etc and i dont class myself as a bone idol layabout
    Like i said i have saved up over those 30 years and put it away like the government advises in saving bonds etc, and just because i have saved up and will be over the maximum allowed i will be penalised for having too much savings to gain the full JSA
    Hence that is why i was thinking of going into the property market
    My savings will sharp go down faster than it took me to save it so im after some genuine advice
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 257.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.