We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Child Benefit Poll
Comments
-
Back in my day, mums worked part-time, or evenings/weekends if money was needed. That was the norm. Not to have childcare and work full-time.0
-
Means testing should include both assets and incomeI hate the idea that says, lower income earners shouldnt pay tax to pay for middle income child benefit.
So where does the tax from the middle income earners go? Is it just low earners that contribute to all Child Benefit payments? I will lose it by about £150 over the income limit. My neighbours both work and earn 80% more than we do but keep Child benefit. My tax pays my Child Benefit easily. Perhaps my tax is earmarked for politicians pensions?
I also dont like this idea that by not paying child benefit, we are somehow penalising the child. No, its the parents who had the child without proper support in place that are penalising their own children. We seem to have removed the onus on supporting our own kids to expecting the government to do so.
Happy to do my bit....but fairly please.0 -
Means testing should include both assets and incomeNo one should receive Child Benefit
AngelEyes81, Bennifred, Chris2685, FATBALLZ, ILW, KeepYourChinUp, Meadows, Money_Mad, MrsE, Proxy, Snooze, Starrystarrynight, angelsmomma, baby_boomer, bigspender2, dave4545454, dopester, gatita, greenbubble, iinvestor, iolanthe07, kissingthepink, mbga9pgf, mcc100, michaels, neverdespairgirl, newleaf, nightwatchman, rewired, romany, sammyjammy, sss555s, stonethrower, tberry6686, tru
Which of you has children then?Not Again0 -
No one should receive Child Benefit1984ReturnsForReal wrote: »No one should receive Child Benefit
AngelEyes81, Bennifred, Chris2685, FATBALLZ, ILW, KeepYourChinUp, Meadows, Money_Mad, MrsE, Proxy, Snooze, Starrystarrynight, angelsmomma, baby_boomer, bigspender2, dave4545454, dopester, gatita, greenbubble, iinvestor, iolanthe07, kissingthepink, mbga9pgf, mcc100, michaels, neverdespairgirl, newleaf, nightwatchman, rewired, romany, sammyjammy, sss555s, stonethrower, tberry6686, tru
Which of you has children then?
Beside the point, people should not be having children if they know they are not capable of supporting them. Would it be right to buy a Ferrari and expect other taxpayers to pay for the petrol?0 -
No one should receive Child BenefitI have no children and don't plan to, so why should I pay for someone else to have kids.0
-
-
Those with Children living in the UKIf people moan about people overstretching themselves on mortgages they need to relate that to their lives and supporting children.
If any one need child benefit to get by on a wage over £40K they need to have a serious look where the hell they are bleeding money. (especially if they have a working partner also)
Some people on here are saving up deposits for houses etc yet making out the removal of this for people on high incomes will be detrimental to their children.
Why would you not save a little less each month so your children are unaffected?0 -
Those on Low Income
You are not using the doctors right now-why should you contributestonethrower wrote: »I have no children and don't plan to, so why should I pay for someone else to have kids.
you are not at school now-why should you contribute
you are not old yet why should you contribute to pensions
you are not a parent yet-but you could be some day-why should we contribute----get the picture now0 -
Means testing should include both assets and incomeBeside the point, people should not be having children if they know they are not capable of supporting them. Would it be right to buy a Ferrari and expect other taxpayers to pay for the petrol?
Its exactly the point.
Or do you think most people wake up one day & thinkOh I will have a child because I can get £15 a week to feed it & cloth it
Interesting observation above about you comparing kids to Ferrari's though.
I wonder I you can get one of those TVR kids???
You could get them to stretch their legs & arms at the hospital for the perfect fit.Not Again0 -
Means testing should include both assets and incomemarkharding557 wrote: »You are not using the doctors right now-why should you contribute
you are not at school now-why should you contribute
you are not old yet why should you contribute to pensions
you are not a parent yet-but you could be some day-why should we contribute----get the picture now
I am not sure I am in favour of contributing to someone who doesn't believe in contributing.Not Again0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards