We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Child Benefit Poll

14567810»

Comments

  • No one should receive Child Benefit
    Malcolm. wrote: »
    Nowdays they all want mobile phones and laptops.

    Keeping up with the Joneses...

    I feel rather sorry for the Joneses - everything's blamed on them!
    ...much enquiry having been made concerning a gentleman, who had quitted a company where Johnson was, and no information being obtained; at last Johnson observed, that 'he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney'.
  • carolt
    carolt Posts: 8,531 Forumite
    Those with Children living in the UK
    Snooze wrote: »
    ...................

    Another constructive post.

    If you have an argument, please make it out loud so we can all benefit from it.
  • carolt
    carolt Posts: 8,531 Forumite
    Those with Children living in the UK
    Couldn't agree more.

    We should maybe go further, and advocate that each couple have a "right to reproduction" - up to a maximum of two - which is fair.

    From third child onwards, parents should become totally liable for cost of health cover, education costs, or at least significant contribution to each). Triplets etc. excluded.

    There would be no logic whatsoever for a government payment to me if I chose to buy a second car, and a third. There is no logic whatsoever for the government to pay me money if I want to look after 15 dogs, three horses and a goat. There is no logic whatsoever for the government to pay me each time I choose to have a child.

    I will have all, some, or none of these at my own choice, and pay accordingly.

    And what about the children born before your enlightened law is passed.

    Don't they have any rights?

    I take it you are one of two or less and that your parents were likewise, or if not, that they were in the first 'lucky' two deemed allowable under your system.


    When will people understand that children are people too, not just expensive accessories, like overgrown labradors or indeed Ferraris, or something?

    Children have rights irrespective of what you may think of their parents.

    End of.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.