We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
helppppppppppp !!!!!!!!!!!
Comments
-
So she has paid 70,000
You have paid 10,000 + 42,000 (estimated mortgage payments over 4.5 years @ 3.8%) + 4000 + 11,000 (monthly bills * 4.5 years) = 67,000
So near as damn it you've each paid half.
If the property is now worth 160,000 then 80,000 seems fair.
Though I've done a lot of guessing!
And having read clutton's post above I agree and am asking myself why I bothered!0 -
I reckon she should get 82,000.blueboy111 wrote: »she wants 80,000 i offered 60,000Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0 -
thank you all sorry about my crappy spelling0
-
-
sorry did say sorry ;-(((0
-
Well 'crappy' was spelt just fine!
I think the problem was not the spelling or grammar but the lack of information, unanswered questions and confusing numbers (she contributed 70,000 or 700,000 !!?)0 -
seventy thousand ,please dont get angry0
-
First of all, I'd say that what you need to do is agree on a method for deciding on how much the house is worth. As in, get three estate agents valuations and take the average, or whatever.
I expect her maths might be; House worth £148 k - Less: Mortgage £48k - Less: Her equity £70k - Less: His equity £10k - leaves joint equity £20k - half of that is mine, so give me £10k plus £70k which is £80k. Which sort of makes sense. Ditto you could well argue that she owes you half of the mortgage interest, council tax etc you've paid over the past 4.5 years. Besides the £20k equity is simply the profit on your previous property (bought 80k, sold for 100k) you might well argue all that is yours depending on how you financed the purchase of that property.
The thing is I don't expect that she would settle for less than the £70k cash she invested in the first place. If you could agree on £70k, you could at least look at it as the repayment of an interest free loan.0 -
thank you, sounds about right0
-
First of all, I'd say that what you need to do is agree on a method for deciding on how much the house is worth. As in, get three estate agents valuations and take the average, or whatever.
No.
If you need to rely on a valuation for any legal purpose such as the above, inheritance tax, executry of an estate, etc - get a valuation from an RICS Surveyor.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards