We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

ipa and overtime

135

Comments

  • themull1
    themull1 Posts: 4,299 Forumite
    I thought when you went Bankrupt it wasn't supposed to be easy? you've already had loads of debt written off, why should you keep all your overtime as well?
  • debtinfo
    debtinfo Posts: 7,012 Forumite
    Im not sure what the problem here is, the OR has asked you to fill in the forms with your currebt circumstances so you hould do so with whatever your income and expenses are
    Hi, im Debtinfo, i am an ex insolvency examiner and over the years have personally dealt with thousands of bankruptcy cases.
    Please note that any views i put forth are not those of my former employer The Insolvency Service and do not constitute professional advice, you should always seek professional advice before entering insolvency proceedings.
  • themull1 wrote: »
    I thought when you went Bankrupt it wasn't supposed to be easy? you've already had loads of debt written off, why should you keep all your overtime as well?

    its just personal view like tv said if he didnt do the overtime creditors would get nothing,but why do loads of hours for £500 in overtime to receive about 150 at best,thats less than the minimum wage isnt it which is illegal, and he is already paying into an ipa so the creditors are getting some monies back,there is no incentive to do the overtime,my view is the rules are too strict here, im not knocking the insolvency service they have rules to follow but it just deters people from sometimes going to work because there not willing to work to have money taken off them and to be honest i dont blame them
  • debtinfo
    debtinfo Posts: 7,012 Forumite
    my view is the rules are too strict here


    You are of course entitled to your view but this sentence did make me laugh. When you put these things into perspective and look at how other countries handle bankruptcy you will see that we have some of the most lenient bankruptcy rules in europe and the western world
    Hi, im Debtinfo, i am an ex insolvency examiner and over the years have personally dealt with thousands of bankruptcy cases.
    Please note that any views i put forth are not those of my former employer The Insolvency Service and do not constitute professional advice, you should always seek professional advice before entering insolvency proceedings.
  • JCS1
    JCS1 Posts: 5,336 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 6 October 2010 at 9:26PM
    its just personal view like tv said if he didnt do the overtime creditors would get nothing,but why do loads of hours for £500 in overtime to receive about 150 at best,thats less than the minimum wage isnt it which is illegal, and he is already paying into an ipa so the creditors are getting some monies back,there is no incentive to do the overtime,my view is the rules are too strict here, im not knocking the insolvency service they have rules to follow but it just deters people from sometimes going to work because there not willing to work to have money taken off them and to be honest i dont blame them

    It's not illegal on national minimum wage grounds - the employers will be paying NMW or above. It's how the money is then spent/distributed which cause the reduction which is nothing to do with the employer.

    Also, with most IPA's the money will go on OR fees rather than to creditors.

    The allowances in BR are far more generous than in a DMP or IVA, so I don't see that the rules relating to IPA's are too strict.

    However, I can see both sides of the issue, and I think is needs to come down to what the individual decides to do.
  • i told my depot manager today that i will probably stop doing call outs soon as whats the point 1. i only get money if i get called out not gauranteed so how can OR work out how much to take.
    2. why should i work 24hr calls if OR takes most of or all of it.
    i dont mind paying ipa but i dont want to be struggling to make ends meet for 3 years i would be better off not working at all
    broxie



    precisely my point i was trying to make there is no incentive here,broxy is being called out in all weathers all times of night to help people,what does he or his family gain from it ,,,,,,,,,,that would be nothing:mad:sfa:mad:nothing i agree broxy stay at home in ya bed
  • debtinfo
    debtinfo Posts: 7,012 Forumite
    Like i said at the start its your choice if you do overtime, As well as the financial implications the other thing i would consider if it was my job in gauging if it was worth it is this, if i turn down the overtime now, will i be asked next time when i am clear of the IPA, At the end of the day its down to personal choice, the OR wont make you work but if you do you need to declare it
    Hi, im Debtinfo, i am an ex insolvency examiner and over the years have personally dealt with thousands of bankruptcy cases.
    Please note that any views i put forth are not those of my former employer The Insolvency Service and do not constitute professional advice, you should always seek professional advice before entering insolvency proceedings.
  • debtinfo wrote: »
    Like i said at the start its your choice if you do overtime, As well as the financial implications the other thing i would consider if it was my job in gauging if it was worth it is this, if i turn down the overtime now, will i be asked next time when i am clear of the IPA, At the end of the day its down to personal choice, the OR wont make you work but if you do you need to declare it


    yep theres all sorts of arguements for and against its all to personal choice we all have views thats why the sites as good as it is it gives people choices but they then have to choose which one:D
  • dojoman
    dojoman Posts: 12,027 Forumite
    yep theres all sorts of arguements for and against its all to personal choice we all have views thats why the sites as good as it is it gives people choices but they then have to choose which one:D

    True, but they should be legal choices and not choices that break the terms of your BR.
    :pB&SC No. 298
    Life`s Tragedy is that we get OLD too soon
    and WISE too late!
  • milothewestie
    milothewestie Posts: 423 Forumite
    edited 7 October 2010 at 11:39AM
    dojoman wrote: »
    True, but they should be legal choices and not choices that break the terms of your BR.


    im not breaking no terms of any bankruptcy its up to the posters what they do isnt it they take the advice and its up to them what they do with it whether its legal or not judge it from both sides right or wrong its somebody elses choice not yours;):o:D:):cool::p
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.