We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Extra oil in tank at end of rental.
Comments
-
Siphon and sell to a neighbour. We benefitted when partner's colleague decided to install gas central heating as we got his leftover oil cheap.
This problem is something I have thought about though, we are in a periodic tenancy and I always wonder what would happen if we were given 2 months notice when we had just filled the tank.0 -
I'm amazed by these responses.
In house sales, it is standard practice for a house buyer to pay for whatever oil the vendor leaves in the tank.
The fact that the LL agreed the amount of oil at the start of the tenancy implies strongly that at the end of the tenancy a comparison would be made. If the tenant left less than 500 litres the LL would have expected the tenant to pay for the missing amount probobly out of his deposit - and quite right too.
But that works both ways. The LL is benefitting from the oil, either by supplying it to the next tenant (and expecting him to leave the same amount), or by using it himself if he's moving in rather than renting again.
A tank that size probobly gets filled once a year. Impossible to estimate how much to put in to guarantee 500 is left when the tenancy ends. The last top-up may have been 6-9 months ago at which time the tenant may have been planning to stay another year. Then the LL may have given the tenant notice 2 months ago for all we know.
Put your claim in writing, and (this is something I rarely advise) do not pay any further rent if any is still due. If the LL claims rent arrears from your deposit via the deposit protection scheme, counter-claim for the oil.
Failing everything else, sue in the small claims court. There was clearly an implied term in the contract, even if it was not explicit.
Or just drain the oil out into the garden of course......0 -
G_M finally asked the obvious question; Who gave notice to end the rental - you or the landlord?
If it was you that handed notice in to end the rental agreement, then you should have taken the quantity of oil into consideration, so if the LL doesn't want to buy it, then take it with you!
If the LL gave you 2 months notice to move out, then he should pay for the oil, as otherwise it's not very fair.Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')
No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)0 -
Sorry pinkshoes, but I disagree.
Although I used the example of the LL giving the tenant notice as an explanation of why the tenant may have been in no position to anticipate how much oil to order last time he had the tank filled, it does not alter the fact that whoever gave notice to who, at the end of the tenancy there should be a reckoning between the oil held at start/end of contract.
That is why "When we move into this rental it was agreed between the Letting Agent and myself that there were 500 litres in the oil tank....."0 -
Sorry pinkshoes, but I disagree.
Although I used the example of the LL giving the tenant notice as an explanation of why the tenant may have been in no position to anticipate how much oil to order last time he had the tank filled, it does not alter the fact that whoever gave notice to who, at the end of the tenancy there should be a reckoning between the oil held at start/end of contract.
That is why "When we move into this rental it was agreed between the Letting Agent and myself that there were 500 litres in the oil tank....."
Is there anything in your contract to stipulate what happens ?0 -
I think oil is usually included in the inventory, if there is one.
Another way in which this is tricky is that oil companies usually have a minimum delivery that they will do. So if your tank is under but not by much you either get a delivery of whatever the minimum is and leave too much, or don't and leave a shortfall. Obviously if your landlord is reasonable you would work out the difference between what's there and what should be there and LL pays for the extra or you pay LL for the shortfall.0 -
Just to declare a vested interest, I am the son of the original poster.
The oil is included in the (very extensive, down to the number of panes of glass in each window...) inventory, marked as 500 litres.I think oil is usually included in the inventory, if there is one.
This was what we were hoping for. Unfortunately it's not going to happen easily...Obviously if your landlord is reasonable you would work out the difference between what's there and what should be there and LL pays for the extra or you pay LL for the shortfall.
To Leory (who made a comparison with rinse aid) I would say the difference in price between the 2 makes the comparison untenable.
To theartfullodger (who is wondering whether he'll get his unlisted items back) I would say that the portability of the items is the huge difference. If you had any furniture or large items unlisted, I would expect them back, although proving they were there at this point may be hard. That doesn't change the expectation.
Our point of view is that this is a large sum (a months mortgage/rent payment), on an item the house has to have, which is tricky to move. The easiest way to deal with this problem properly and fairly is to be reimbursed. But then, that's just our point of view.
Our current best course of action may be to hire an oil bowser - apparently you can get one for £100 a day, which for £500 of fuel is definitely worthwhile. It's still a lot of hassle though, which we could do without when we're trying to move house.
Thanks for all the responses though
They've been helpful.
Swordz0 -
As I've said before - sue.
The fact that the oil is on the inventory (new information), makes your case even stronger.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
