We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Support for mortgage interest benefit cut by thousands of pounds

1181921232428

Comments

  • silvercar
    silvercar Posts: 49,923 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Academoney Grad Name Dropper
    Isn't the balance to allow SMI paying the interest only for say 6 months (after 3 month delay). If people see no opportunity to be earning after that time, they need to sell up and accept they can't afford their home. I can see the need for the taxpayer to pay the interest for a short time, we are meant to care for others, not throw them on the street.
    I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.
  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    carolt wrote: »
    You want special pleading for homeowners - I wonder why.
    oh so it's personal now...

    as we've gone in that direction... let's be straight about a couple of things... the only reason that you want people to be put on the street and kicked out of their homes is so that you can buy a house...

    it's smacks so much of desperation that you screwed it all up in the past and never bought a house before they increase in value that you now want families on streets so you can fulfil that dream of owning a home...

    never mind eh... chin up.... that's the spirit, never say die...
  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Why shouldn't there be a distinction between the classes? A homeowner's not a renter and vice versa.
    because she wants people thrown out on the streets so she can buy a house.

    these are the type of desperate people on this forum... never mind...
  • olly300
    olly300 Posts: 14,738 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    silvercar wrote: »
    Isn't the balance to allow SMI paying the interest only for say 6 months (after 3 month delay). If people see no opportunity to be earning after that time, they need to sell up and accept they can't afford their home. I can see the need for the taxpayer to pay the interest for a short time, we are meant to care for others, not throw them on the street.

    In recessions houses take longer than 6 months to sell.

    In the recession of the 90s I know people who walked away from their houses after trying to sell them for much longer than that.

    Hence the period of 2 years is sufficient to either shift the house or sort something out with the mortgage company. I know people who can find tenants for their properties but can't sell them after having them on the market for a year.
    I'm not cynical I'm realistic :p

    (If a link I give opens pop ups I won't know I don't use windows)
  • carolt
    carolt Posts: 8,531 Forumite
    Why shouldn't there be a distinction between the classes? A homeowner's not a renter and vice versa.

    Because we are all humans and therefore equal.
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    silvercar wrote: »
    Isn't the balance to allow SMI paying the interest only for say 6 months (after 3 month delay). If people see no opportunity to be earning after that time, they need to sell up and accept they can't afford their home. I can see the need for the taxpayer to pay the interest for a short time, we are meant to care for others, not throw them on the street.

    Good point, or alternatively the government take a share in the property equivalent to the interest paid, eg pay 3% for a year get 3% of the property. The buyer is welcome to buy this back if and when they get back on their feet.
  • carolt
    carolt Posts: 8,531 Forumite
    chucky wrote: »
    oh so it's personal now...

    as we've gone in that direction... let's be straight about a couple of things... the only reason that you want people to be put on the street and kicked out of their homes is so that you can buy a house...

    it's smacks so much of desperation that you screwed it all up in the past and never bought a house before they increase in value that you now want families on streets so you can fulfil that dream of owning a home...

    never mind eh... chin up.... that's the spirit, never say die...


    I asked you a question, you threw insults.

    A return to your usual form, eh.


    Oh well, I expected nothing more.
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    Why shouldn't there be a distinction between the classes? A homeowner's not a renter and vice versa.

    No problem with a distinction, just one group should not receive favourable treatment.
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    We might all be human but not everyone is equal. Why do you think we have classes?

    Oh dear....
  • carolt
    carolt Posts: 8,531 Forumite
    We might all be human but not everyone is equal. Why do you think we have classes?

    Do we have classes? Are we still at school? How old are you?

    Are you suggesting that social class division is a good thing, and that whether one should be entitled to own their own home should be based on what social class they happen to have been born in to?

    Do you really think that is desirable? Were you born upper class? If not, how can your conscience square owning a house?

    Confused. Very. Did we jump back a century without my noticing?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.