We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Support for mortgage interest benefit cut by thousands of pounds

1151618202128

Comments

  • Graham_Devon
    Graham_Devon Posts: 58,560 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    woodbine wrote: »
    the link you supply is rubbish as it includes low fixed rate and trackers,its not a representation of svr`s in general,the 45,000 figure assumes that 20% of those on SMI will have to sell a figure that is borne out by posts all over the internet,and perhaps you have a link to show that those over 60 have a large amount of equity?they are just as likely to have large mortgages.
    the last tory govt "gaveaway"large chunks of social housing btw

    It includes all mortgage products.

    Are you suggesting that ALL those on SMI are on SVR products? None are on trackers or fixes?

    Bit of an assumption isn't it?

    As for the over 60's, only way they can have large mortgages still is if they have repeatedly remortgaged and released equity. It's highly unlikely lenders would have lent large amounts on a mortgage to someone over 50.
  • It includes all mortgage products.

    Are you suggesting that ALL those on SMI are on SVR products? None are on trackers or fixes?

    Bit of an assumption isn't it?

    As for the over 60's, only way they can have large mortgages still is if they have repeatedly remortgaged and released equity. It's highly unlikely lenders would have lent large amounts on a mortgage to someone over 50.

    the VAST majority of those getting SMI are on SVR`s the govts own figures admit that at least
    i think the argument about the over 60`s is abit of a smokescreen as even someone with an outstanding mortgage of 30k will have to find another £50 a month from yesterday,and of course there are people of all ages who have been on long term benefits(sick/disabled and unemployed)whos outstanding mortgage will be well above 30k

    wether you or others chose to believe it or not this is yet another timebomb waiting to explode all over this slimey govt.
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    So, if you cannot afford to pay for your house, you may have to move. What is the problem.
  • silvercar
    silvercar Posts: 49,914 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Academoney Grad Name Dropper
    ILW wrote: »
    So, if you cannot afford to pay for your house, you may have to move. What is the problem.

    In case you hadn't noticed, selling a home at the moment takes months. Plus, if you are in negative equity you can't sell.
    I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    I don't get this.
    On all mortgage apps it says "your home is at risk if you do not keep up the payments", does that not apply any more?
  • silvercar
    silvercar Posts: 49,914 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Academoney Grad Name Dropper
    ILW wrote: »
    I don't get this.
    On all mortgage apps it says "your home is at risk if you do not keep up the payments", does that not apply any more?

    Yes it applies, you can get some government help in the form of SMI to help you make those payments.
    I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.
  • dmg24
    dmg24 Posts: 33,920 Forumite
    10,000 Posts
    ILW wrote: »
    So, if you cannot afford to pay for your house, you may have to move. What is the problem.

    Should that not apply to those in rented accom also, who can potentially receive LHA and discretionary payments?
    Gone ... or have I?
  • nearlynew
    nearlynew Posts: 3,800 Forumite
    People relying on SMI have something in common with priced out FTBs - neither can afford to buy a house.


    why should one group be favoured over another?
    "The problem with quotes on the internet is that you never know whether they are genuine or not" -
    Albert Einstein
  • ILW wrote: »
    I don't get this.
    On all mortgage apps it says "your home is at risk if you do not keep up the payments", does that not apply any more?

    why should it apply if someone suddenly finds they are too sick to work,or lose their jobs in an area of high unemployment?
    this is the uk still one of the worlds richest nations,we have a welfare state to which we all pay into when able to,not some 3rd world african dump
  • nearlynew wrote: »
    People relying on SMI have something in common with priced out FTBs - neither can afford to buy a house.


    why should one group be favoured over another?

    why should one group have to give up a home they may have spent years putting together?
    abolish smi and you would have to build 200,000 new social housing,then let them out totally rent free
    so smi or a bill for billion....you decide.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.