We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Buyer wants to do something odd with stamp duty
Comments
-
needaspirin wrote:Both you and the buyer win if you sell at £422000 and they pay the tax.
If they pay you £422000 then pay 3% stamp duty of £12660, they pay a total of £434660, saving £340 on your asking price.
Plus as mentioned, selling at £422000 cuts the EA fees.
Probably a weeze suggested by the EA to maximise their fees.0 -
When the market was slow here (Birmingham) a lot of agents were advertising their properties with stamp duty paid by vendor. I always thought that you needed to have the stamp duty 'in your pocket' as it could not be added onto your mortgage it was one of your costs like solicitors fees, searches etc. May be wrong tho!
I'd ask your solicitor for advice before accepting/declining the offer.0 -
Penny_Farthing wrote:Not sure. Apparently they were talking about doing 50 grands worth of work to it so I don't think they're short of cash.
Hmm
Maybe this is implying it needs lots of work in the hope you'll accept a lower offerAnnual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen and six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery0 -
We soon put them right on that one, PoorDave! It does need work but could be made decent with 20 grand not 50 unless they wanted to gold leaf the place!!0
-
I am going to tell EA that we want to accept a straight offer and not the stamp duty one as it's doing my head in!!0
-
Yes it seems to me the EA might have suggested that you'll only accept the asking price.This way the EA gets more commission.
Seems very strange to put low offer in then increase it by such vast amount.0 -
As previously stated, the EA will prefer the higher official sale price because of their fee.
One other thing the buyer might like about the higher official sale price is that it will be registered with the land registry at the higher price. When he comes to re-sell and people try to check how much it sold for last time, they will see a higher value which he might hope will help him get a better resale price.
From the OP's point of view, the straight sale is better.
A house down our road had a sale agreed at £255k with the seller paying the stamp duty. However, in the end they decided on a straight sale at £250k which would have benefitted the seller but not the buyer. I don't know the reason why the deal was changed.0 -
The benefit of getting the seller to pay for the stamp duty is that the buyer can legitemately get a mortgage on the "higher" asking price, but has the money that would have gone in stamp duty to spend on the property instead.
The EA fees might be slightly higher, but that depends on the EA fees srtucture. Some near me charge a fixed % whilst some operate a banding system. If the difference in purchase price does not move you into a new bracket then the fees would be the same.0 -
santana-mx3 wrote:
One other thing the buyer might like about the higher official sale price is that it will be registered with the land registry at the higher price. When he comes to re-sell and people try to check how much it sold for last time, they will see a higher value which he might hope will help him get a better resale price.
I concur!
We've just bought a brand new house with a 5% discount. Land registry shows full price, meaning builder can ask for more on same house style in phase 2 of build.Who made hogs and dogs and frogs?
0 -
Sumostar wrote:The benefit of getting the seller to pay for the stamp duty is that the buyer can legitemately get a mortgage on the "higher" asking price, but has the money that would have gone in stamp duty to spend on the property instead.
The EA fees might be slightly higher, but that depends on the EA fees srtucture. Some near me charge a fixed % whilst some operate a banding system. If the difference in purchase price does not move you into a new bracket then the fees would be the same.
I could understand this, Sumostar, if the buyer was having a 90% + mortgage but surely he won't have that percentage mortgage on a house at £435,000 which is steep for Cardiff?
There's something going on that I don't understand. It may not be a bad something but I either need to find out what the something is, or get them to give us a straight offer.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards