We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

'Time for a full revaluation of council tax bands?' poll discussion

Options
Former_MSE_Lawrence
Former_MSE_Lawrence Posts: 975 Forumite
edited 5 October 2010 at 10:38AM in MoneySaving polls
Time for a full revaluation of council tax bands?

English & Scottish homes’ council tax bands still rely on rushed valuations by estate agents driving past in 1991, and haven’t been touched since - leaving 400,000 homes in the wrong band (see council tax rebanding to check yours).

Last week, the govt. ruled out a full-scale revaluation worried some would move up bands (others would of course be lowered).

Which of these is closest to your view?

A. 20 years is too long – we need a full revaluation - 2,093 votes (34 %)
B. Leave it as it is – too much risk of it going wrong - 1,353 votes (22 %)
C. Leave it as it is but allow everyone a right to appeal if theirs is wrong - 2,411 votes (39 %)
D. I'm in Wales or Northern Ireland - this doesn't apply - 343 votes (6 %)

This vote has closed, but you can still click 'post reply' to discuss below. Thanks :)

Also see the ministers open door to councilt tax appeal reform news story

[threadbanner]box[/threadbanner]
«13

Comments

  • Gareth_Lazelle
    Gareth_Lazelle Posts: 110 Forumite
    edited 27 September 2010 at 11:19AM
    A - those who are artificially in lower bands than they should be (i.e.: with expensive houses) are being subsidised by everyone else!

    C will result in council tax rising (because folks will only claim if they see their tax going down, which will reduce tax revenues),

    <edit>Oh - and for context, I live in Devon, so if my tax is going to change at all it will be going up,
    - GL
  • Leave it as it is but giving everyone the right to appeal, I think a full revaluation of every property would cost a fortune for little benefit.
    If you don't like what I say slap me around with a large trout and PM me to tell me why.

    If you do like it please hit the thanks button.
  • youngie
    youngie Posts: 1,000 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Combo Breaker
    not many properties will have gone down in value in 20 years so most homes will be in a different band but surely the bands will also have to be reset and the cost of all of that will far outwiegh the revenue increase so the government?councils will be out of pocket it makes sense to leave it as it is and persue those who default
  • MSE_Martin
    MSE_Martin Posts: 8,272 Money Saving Expert
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    youngie wrote: »
    not many properties will have gone down in value in 20 years so most homes will be in a different band but surely the bands will also have to be reset and the cost of all of that will far outwiegh the revenue increase so the government?councils will be out of pocket it makes sense to leave it as it is and persue those who default


    Yes a revaluation if done would be at current prices :)
    Martin Lewis, Money Saving Expert.
    Please note, answers don't constitute financial advice, it is based on generalised journalistic research. Always ensure any decision is made with regards to your own individual circumstance.
    Don't miss out on urgent MoneySaving, get my weekly e-mail at www.moneysavingexpert.com/tips.
    Debt-Free Wannabee Official Nerd Club: (Honorary) Members number 000
  • BNT
    BNT Posts: 2,788 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    edited 27 September 2010 at 8:31PM
    How about treating it as a genuine council tax and let each council decide how they want to handle rather than have the national government intervene.
  • rag31
    rag31 Posts: 198 Forumite
    Where is the 'stop playing round with this fundamentally unfair tax and instead introduce a local income tax' option? I can't vote for any of these because the tax is basically flawed and no amount of tweaking can alter that.
    Mum of 4 lovely children
  • sue.b_2
    sue.b_2 Posts: 105 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10 Posts Combo Breaker
    I can't see many of my neighbours going for an appeal. Some of them have built massive extensions so that the original house is hidden inside. My immediate neighbours are still two bands lower than I am but in a house twice the size. I wish I could appeal against their banding.
    The only fair way to deal with this is a full revaluation.
  • an1179
    an1179 Posts: 1,847 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    All the groundwork has already been done for the re-valuation. All the figures are there.
  • I voted A because, as sue.b rightly points out, these massively extended homes are only revalued for council tax when sold. Several houses on my estate are in band C, like mine, when they should really be in D or E or even higher. I can't appeal because they are currently valued on their original size.

    I also agree that a local income tax should replace the council tax plus a basic charge for each home for the services everyone receives - a mix of poll tax plus income tax on ability to pay. That shouldn't cost very much to implement.
  • I live in Wales, and when we were re-evaluated we were told that some people would go up, some down and some stay where they are. My whole village went up 2 bands, but were given two years to make the full adjustment.

    I agree that the tax is unfair and should be based on income rather than the value of a property.

    Also, I feel really aggrieved that people in rural areas are subsidising the people in towns and cities. When you look at the services that rural areas receive in comparison to built up areas it beggars belief that we have to pay the same price. The council says that we can use all of the facilities in the towns, but fail to take into account that many of us have ridiculously long trips to enjoy the ornamental parks, libraries, leisure centres, etc, not to mention things like daily street sweeping compared to our quarterly cleaning (if we're lucky) and kerbside recycling compared to our community recycling bins which we have to take our rubbish to. Rural poverty is far more isolating than urban poverty and is only exacerbated by the lack of facilities and services.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.