We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Completely Useless Information
Options

haveibeendone
Posts: 101 Forumite
in Techie Stuff
I came across a site (http://ns1758.ca/winch/winchest.html) that said an IBM 5 Mb hard disk drive cost $50,000 in 1956. At $10,000/Mb this got me wondering about the 640 Gb HDD in my Dell.
In 1956 a 640Gb HDD would have cost approx $10,000 per Mb = $10 million dollars per Gb = $6.4 Billion for 640 Gb. Hope the sums are right.
Allowing for inflation between 1956 and now (This Is Money) @19.6 fold this gives approx $125 Billion for the drive.
The site rates my 640 Gb at $50 at todays prices.
In 1956 a 640Gb HDD would have cost approx $10,000 per Mb = $10 million dollars per Gb = $6.4 Billion for 640 Gb. Hope the sums are right.
Allowing for inflation between 1956 and now (This Is Money) @19.6 fold this gives approx $125 Billion for the drive.
The site rates my 640 Gb at $50 at todays prices.
0
Comments
-
Yes , that's pretty useless but I would have thought that the cost of things has gone up by more than 19.6 times since 1956?0
-
-
$50,000 for 5Gb is a bargain. Where can I get one?Throwing acid is bad.... in some peoples eyes...0
-
The cost is nothing, the main issue is that it will be the size of your house and all the lights in the neighbourhood will dim when it spins up0
-
There were no PCs in 1956. That is an early mainframe disk and would like as not be at least filing cabinet size.
When I started in IT (or DP as it was called in those days) in 1970 the low end IBM mainframe disks were 2311s and only had ~ 7MB capacity. The actual disk bit was removable and something over a foot across. It sat in a cabinet about waist height and 2 to 3 feet across.0 -
haveibeendone wrote: »I came across a site (http://ns1758.ca/winch/winchest.html) that said an IBM 5 Mb hard disk drive cost $50,000 in 1956. At $10,000/Mb this got me wondering about the 640 Gb HDD in my Dell.
In 1956 a 640Gb HDD would have cost approx $10,000 per Mb = $10 million dollars per Gb = $6.4 Billion for 640 Gb. Hope the sums are right.
Allowing for inflation between 1956 and now (This Is Money) @19.6 fold this gives approx $125 Billion for the drive.
The site rates my 640 Gb at $50 at todays prices.
- are these drives only SCSi / IDE / or are they SATA and .. .. will they work with Audiophile SATA cables ?Disclaimer : Everything I write on this forum is my opinion. I try to be an even-handed poster and accept that you at times may not agree with these opinions or how I choose to express them, this is not my problem. The Disabled : If years cannot be added to their lives, at least life can be added to their years - Alf Morris - ℜ0 -
This takes me back to secondary school...
Our Computer room got in a "massive" 250Mb hard disk drive unit for our network of 20 BBC Model B Micros...
Massive being the operative word! it was a box just over 2 foot wide, a foot deep and 10 inches high!
Network storage! no more floppy disks! Woo!!! lolLaters
Sol
"Have you found the secrets of the universe? Asked Zebade "I'm sure I left them here somewhere"0 -
kwikbreaks wrote: »There were no PCs in 1956. That is an early mainframe disk and would like as not be at least filing cabinet size.
When I started in IT (or DP as it was called in those days) in 1970 the low end IBM mainframe disks were 2311s and only had ~ 7MB capacity. The actual disk bit was removable and something over a foot across. It sat in a cabinet about waist height and 2 to 3 feet across.0 -
I was an operator at the time.
We didn't use them for curling but they were pretty robust - there were odd points in the schedule when we needed to swap packs and as we got to go home when the schedule was completed (only 2 shifts) we used to stop the disks quicker by lifting the lid and sticking our palms on the top platter :eek:
I remember a bit later after I'd moved to a different company seeing a sandwich circling in a 2319 (iirc) tray which another operator had somehow dropped in. Naturally food and drink were always banned from the machine room but standards tended to slip (a lot) on night shift.
Once I moved on from operating IT became boring...0 -
kwikbreaks wrote: »When I started in IT (or DP as it was called in those days) in 1970 the low end IBM mainframe disks were 2311s and only had ~ 7MB capacity. The actual disk bit was removable and something over a foot across. It sat in a cabinet about waist height and 2 to 3 feet across.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 257.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards