We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Will the govenment spending review be much less painful than we are led to believe?

245678

Comments

  • bendix
    bendix Posts: 5,499 Forumite
    I hope the cuts are savage.
  • StevieJ
    StevieJ Posts: 20,174 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Yes, no doubt they're talking up the extent of the cuts and they won't be anywhere near as bad
    It makes sense to psychologically soften up with threats of oh so savage cuts and with the actual changes not as bad, think Capital Gains Tax changes.
    'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher
  • mbga9pgf
    mbga9pgf Posts: 3,224 Forumite
    edited 18 August 2010 at 2:44PM
    No, reserve your seat in the bunker and bring all the beans you can carry
    I have heard a rumor (from a very reputable source) that 40% job cuts are going to be announced in some public sector departments in October. Lets put it this way; the government are looking at keeping council tax down for a long long while. From what I hear, the govt are planning to get all the bad news out in a one-er, as its going to be so grim that they need to get it done quickly.

    I am not messing around. Come November, there will be NO DOUBT as to why interest rates are staying so low for so long.
  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    mbga9pgf wrote: »
    I have heard a rumor that 40% job cuts are going to be announced in some public sector departments in October. From what I hear, the govt are planning to get all the bad news out in a one-er, as its going to be so grim that they need to get it done quickly.

    I am not messing around. Come November, there will be NO DOUBT as to why interest rates are staying so low for so long.
    you got more chance of your ALT-A ticking time bomb going off than 40% cuts...
  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 18 August 2010 at 2:48PM
    Yes, no doubt they're talking up the extent of the cuts and they won't be anywhere near as bad
    mbga9pgf wrote: »
    I have heard a rumor that 40% job cuts are going to be announced in some public sector departments in October.

    Which ones? councils have already been given the 25% mandate to cut costs. They start being implemented now to the start of the next financial year.

    Some departments will be cut 100% but that then means other departments have to make fewer cuts.

    40% of staff would be way over 40% of costs I would say (Staff being the highest cost in most departments)

    Some departemnts were asked to budget for 25 and 40% though, but 25% is being implemented AFIK.
  • michaels
    michaels Posts: 29,564 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Except that may be as a shopkeeper a lot of your revenue comes from the govt workers all based nearby or as a builder several of your customers contemplating an extension chose not two as one of their dual incomes was in a public sector or local govt job that no longer exists etc.
    Really2 wrote: »
    If your company has no exposure to the public sector it is fairly obvious you will not be as greatly affect as those who are.
    I think....
  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 18 August 2010 at 3:02PM
    Yes, no doubt they're talking up the extent of the cuts and they won't be anywhere near as bad
    michaels wrote: »
    Except that may be as a shopkeeper a lot of your revenue comes from the govt workers all based nearby or as a builder several of your customers contemplating an extension chose not two as one of their dual incomes was in a public sector or local govt job that no longer exists etc.

    Or you could be a shop keeper who just sells to anyone not just government workers or a builder who has not had a job cancelled.

    What does it do? my example is indeed more plausible than yours. (because there will be less than 25% job cuts, it is cost cuts, so managers etc will be first to go and make up for 2-4 staff jobs)

    You could be wast company who lands a contract because of this etc, but I am not going to bleat on about possibilities.

    In reality how many shop keepers and builders do you think will go bust on these cuts?

    I suppose you would have rather they paid twice as much tax (and everyone else in the country for that matter) to keep the services and go bust that way?
  • It's the 1980s all over again! The Tories will cut spending and taxes and when Labour get in next, they will spend & tax! Anyway, just to put everybody's mind at rest, governments are generally inept at cutting spending so I don't believe it will be that bad.
  • amersall
    amersall Posts: 17,037 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    No, reserve your seat in the bunker and bring all the beans you can carry
    Blacklight wrote: »
    Thinking back to the budget and all the talk of the tax hikes, CGT crippling every landlord in the country, scrapping NI and lumping it into one tax, etc. None of it was as bad as all the talk in the press. In fact I remember being quite pleased that day about how much more tax I'd have to pay, as it was much less than I expected.

    Is the same now true of the austerity measures due to be announced this Autumn? Will there be 40% cuts in front line services and 600,000 public sector workers unemployed by April 2011? Or will we end up feeling like we've all had a lucky escape again?

    Hi there, when was ni scrapped and made into one tax?. my husband still pays ni as a seperate deduction on his pay slips.
  • mbga9pgf
    mbga9pgf Posts: 3,224 Forumite
    No, reserve your seat in the bunker and bring all the beans you can carry
    chucky wrote: »
    you got more chance of your ALT-A ticking time bomb going off than 40% cuts...

    http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20100806-715942.html
    Moody's Investors Service downgraded $2.3 billion in securities backed by Alt-A residential mortgages as the loans continue to sour.
    The residential mortgage-backed securities, or RMBS, were issued by MASTR Alternative Loan Trust and MASTR Adjustable Rate Mortgages Trust in 2006 and 2007.
    Moody's has downgraded hundreds of billions of dollars of RMBS in recent months as credit raters have steadily cut ratings on mortgage-backed securities, revising the amount of losses expected as their credit quality sours on falling home prices, high unemployment and the slow economy.
    On Friday, the ratings service downgraded 72 tranches, upgraded three and confirmed three from eight RMBS transactions that were backed by Alt-A loans.
    RMBS helped feed the housing boom and wound up in the hands of investment funds or in more complicated pools known as collateralized debt obligations, in which underlying mortgage pools were further sliced into tranches according to their perceived risk. Alt-A loans are typically given to prime-rated borrowers who didn't document assets and/or income.

    Where is your recovery chucky? :cool:

    I bet you werent expecting the US government to be bailing out mortgages still in 2010-2011 back when this started in 2007....


    If I am wrong in November, go ahead. But mark myt words, october-november will be the worst months of this electoral term in terms of public sentiment.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.6K Life & Family
  • 262K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.