We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

FTB's "Missing Deal Of A Lifetime"

18911131423

Comments

  • DervProf
    DervProf Posts: 4,035 Forumite
    I`m not saying speculation should be punished. I`m saying that it is a dangerous game to play, by interfering in a so called free market, bailing out those who would have otherwise failed. If you take a risk (gamble) and lose, then you should lose. That`s what prevents more people from going into the bookmakers. As you say, modest HPI would be the best scenario. I would sugget that since 2001, HPI has been anything but modest, yet I keep hearing calls for a correction to be avoided.
    30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.
  • DervProf
    DervProf Posts: 4,035 Forumite
    julieq wrote: »
    And the taxpayer hasn't spent a penny bailing out the banks. The taxpayer is making a profit at this point in time.

    Just like Sibley is making a profit on his home ? Just like I am, apparently. I don`t think a profit is really a profit until it is realised. I recently sold some shares and took the profit. Until I sold those shares (which I believe is what the taxpayer intends to do with the bank shares that it now owns), the profit was only on paper.

    Talking of shares, I bought them, knowing there was a risk, and my speculation paid off. I knew that there was a risk that they may have fallen in value. I wouldn`t have expected anyone else to cover any of my loss, should I have made one. BP has made the news recently, and it is widely known that investors in pension funds may well suffer a financial penalty because of the mistakes that BP have made. Will the taxpayer give any financial assistance to restore the lost value in these pensions ? I doubt it, and don`t expect it.

    In my opinion, the UK property market has been given free reign to inflate itself beyond reasonable levels, and has done so at the expense of many other more productive areas of our economy. It`s come to the point where we really can`t afford for it to fall in value very far, so we are now relying on base rates being kept at a low level, and hoping that the banks will loosen lending criteria so that our economy doesn`t suffer. I really don`t think this is a good situation to be in. During the recent "boom", I spoke to many people about the possibilty of this happening, but most were too busy checking up on how much "wealthier" they had become in the last month to take any notice.
    30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.
  • Orpheo
    Orpheo Posts: 1,058 Forumite
    edited 9 August 2010 at 8:07AM
    Sibley wrote: »
    Buying and owning a house takes hard work,risks and you have worries a renter would never understand. The dripping tap doesn't fix itself, new fence doesn't suddenly appear etc etc.

    Sibley, you Da Vinci among homeowners. We can only lament the fact that we all lack the the genius it takes to sort out the issues you raise in your post...

    No, wait!

    yellowpages.jpg
    Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam
  • Orpheo
    Orpheo Posts: 1,058 Forumite
    julieq wrote: »
    Normal lending is 10% or less deposit around 5% interest, i.e. what we have had by and large for the past 10 years or so.

    So normal lending is defined in an entirely arbitrary manner as suits your argument?
    Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam
  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Orpheo wrote: »
    So normal lending is defined in an entirely arbitrary manner as suits your argument?
    :) this poster qestions another poster what normal lending is but is unabable to give an example of what they think normal lending is... oh dear... the irony is brilliant...

    normal lending is determined by market environment....

    lending is cheaper and easier to get when house prices are rising.
    lending becomes more expensive and harder to get after house prices have fallen

    it happens each and every time...
  • DervProf
    DervProf Posts: 4,035 Forumite
    chucky wrote: »
    :) this poster qestions another poster what normal lending is but is unabable to give an example of what they think normal lending is... oh dear... the irony is brilliant...

    normal lending is determined by market environment....

    lending is cheaper and easier to get when house prices are rising.
    lending becomes more expensive and harder to get after house prices have fallen

    Wouldn`t property market boom and bust be a thing of the past (as promised by a certain ex prime minister) if it were the other way around ?

    I`ll add that I think we should really be discussing sensible lending, rather than what we think is "normal".
    30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.
  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    DervProf wrote: »
    Wouldn`t property market boom and bust be a thing of the past (as promised by a certain ex prime minister) if it were the other way around ?
    no idea - i don't make the rules and have control of what former PM's or even Chancellors say.
    DervProf wrote: »
    I`ll add that I think we should really be discussing sensible lending, rather than what we think is "normal".
    define "sensible" lending?

    ps. please don't, it's quite subjective really and depends on peoples circumstances and isn't a one size fits all answer unfortunately.

    it requires a new thread...
  • DervProf
    DervProf Posts: 4,035 Forumite
    edited 9 August 2010 at 9:01AM
    Sibley wrote: »
    With low interest rates it's a good time to own a home.

    :rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

    Genius ! (Not).

    There are so many things I could pick out of Sibley`s post and destroy, but I simply haven`t got the time, and I`m not going to upset a fellow with a sword.
    30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.
  • Orpheo
    Orpheo Posts: 1,058 Forumite
    edited 9 August 2010 at 9:12AM
    chucky wrote: »
    :) this poster qestions another poster what normal lending is but is unabable to give an example of what they think normal lending is... oh dear... the irony is brilliant...

    normal lending is determined by market environment....

    lending is cheaper and easier to get when house prices are rising.
    lending becomes more expensive and harder to get after house prices have fallen

    it happens each and every time...

    There is no irony you dullard. I made no attempt to define normal lending because it would have been just as arbitrary as julieq's arbitrary definition. If I had tried to define it I would have defeated my own argument.

    "Normal" lending is determined by the market environment. Except for when the market is "supported" with lies and fraudulent mechanics such as self-certification mortgages.

    If the governments had really had allowed the market environment to have its way without interference, the house of cards would truly have come down. The prosecutions for fraud would be a bloodbath and the indebted would be eye-deep in the ****. The landscape now would be very, very different.
    Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam
  • Linton
    Linton Posts: 18,345 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Hung up my suit!
    edited 9 August 2010 at 9:07AM
    davilown wrote: »
    So how long would it take you to 'prudently' save the 25% deposit for an average house price of £250,000?

    FTBers dont buy average houses, they buy cheaper houses. Average houses, on average, are bought by people trading up.

    And according to the Nationwide survey, the average house price is £169K
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.