We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

FTB's "Missing Deal Of A Lifetime"

1568101123

Comments

  • pardal51
    pardal51 Posts: 427 Forumite
    pmsl if need this spelling out then you would'nt understand.
    pmsl??????
  • DervProf
    DervProf Posts: 4,035 Forumite
    chucky wrote: »
    bank of mum and dad would have gone on then too - the answer for me is that tougher lending criteria now takes a bigger slice of buyers out of the equation so the calculation subset is smaller.

    I suggest that BOMAD is shelling out more £, and more often than back in 1990.

    If tougher lending criteria is here to stay, I wonder what the outcome will be ?

    And what`s wrong with the requirement for a 10%+ deposit anyway ? If we gradually go back to 100%(+) mortgages, then they will become the norm. I think that`s dangerous territory.
    30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.
  • tommy75
    tommy75 Posts: 583 Forumite
    pardal51 wrote: »
    pmsl??????
    liek zomg lol 11!
  • DervProf
    DervProf Posts: 4,035 Forumite
    chucky wrote: »
    i don't think anyone made that point - if anything that would indicate house prices should be lower right now.

    I didn`t state that anyone did make that point. I used the word "if".
    30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.
  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    DervProf wrote: »
    I suggest that BOMAD is shelling out more £, and more often than back in 1990.

    If tougher lending criteria is here to stay, I wonder what the outcome will be ?

    And what`s wrong with the requirement for a 10%+ deposit anyway ? If we gradually go back to 100%(+) mortgages, then they will become the norm. I think that`s dangerous territory.
    only people that can afford to buy will be able to buy...
  • DervProf
    DervProf Posts: 4,035 Forumite
    chucky wrote: »
    only people that can afford to buy will be able to buy...

    Well done.

    And isn`t that the way it should be ?

    Oh, and I`ll also say that another outcome could be that vendors have to lower their asking prices.
    30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.
  • Graham_Devon
    Graham_Devon Posts: 58,560 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    chucky wrote: »
    only people that can afford to buy will be able to buy...

    Sometimes, just sometimes, your genius just astounds me.

    You can even shoot both feet at the same time!

    In a min you will be back on to the reason people can't afford homes is because of restrictive lending ;)
  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    DervProf wrote: »
    And isn`t that the way it should be ?
    that's the way i've always seen it - some see it as their right to be able to buy a property. i don't...
    DervProf wrote: »
    Oh, and I`ll also say that another outcome could be that vendors have to lower their asking prices.
    it could be - that always depends on how many forced sellers there are out there at the time
  • HAMISH_MCTAVISH
    HAMISH_MCTAVISH Posts: 28,592 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    DervProf wrote: »
    If tougher lending criteria is here to stay, I wonder what the outcome will be ?

    A generation locked out of property ownership, as investors with equity/cash to leverage take advantage of the steadily rising rents that are an inevitable consequence of population growth when housebuilding doesn't keep up.
    And what`s wrong with the requirement for a 10%+ deposit anyway ?

    Nothing. So long as rates for 10% deposits are competitive, whereas just now the banks are shamelessly profiteering on them.
    “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.

    Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

    -- President John F. Kennedy”
  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Sometimes, just sometimes, your genius just astounds me.

    You can even shoot both feet at the same time!

    In a min you will be back on to the reason people can't afford homes is because of restrictive lending ;)
    oh dear - you get even more stupid by the post... hard to do but you're getting there...
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.