We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

FTB's "Missing Deal Of A Lifetime"

191012141523

Comments

  • Orpheo
    Orpheo Posts: 1,058 Forumite
    DervProf wrote: »
    I think we should really be discussing sensible lending, rather than what we think is "normal".
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    This.
    Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam
  • DervProf
    DervProf Posts: 4,035 Forumite
    chucky wrote: »
    no idea - i don't make the rules and have control of what former PM's or even Chancellors say.

    It was a simple question/suggestion for debate. I wasn`t asking you to implement the idea that I put forward. I know that what we say here won`t make any difference, but I think most of us are here to voice our opinions and to discuss the (mainly) ups and downs of the property market.

    I`ll try to explain.

    If interest rates (and therefore mortgage repayments) rose when property prices increased, but fell as property prices fall, I suspect that the property market might not attract so many speculators, and would therefore be a lot more stable.

    I wish we did have a little more control over what the previous PM and Chancellor said and did. Maybe we would be in a better financial position.
    30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.
  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Orpheo wrote: »
    There is no irony you dullard.
    oh dear, what a great start...
    Orpheo wrote: »
    I made no attempt to define normal lending because it would have been just as arbitrary as julieq's arbitrary definition. If I had tried to define it I would have defeated my own argument.
    so you're not going to define it?
    Orpheo wrote: »
    "Normal" lending is determined by the market environment. Except for when the market is "supported" with lies and fraudulent mechanics such as self-certification mortgages.
    hold on... you've changed your mind in one post and are now defining it... how many personalities do you actually have??
    Orpheo wrote: »
    If the governements had really had allowed the market environment to have its way without interference, the house of cards would truly have come down. The prosecutions for fraud would be a bloodbath and the indebted would be eye-deep in the ****. The landscape now would be very, very different.
    don't you mean if the government had done what Orpheo wanted, it would have allowed the market enviornment to do what Orpheo needed it to happen.

    chin up Oreo, don't worry about it. you'll understand one day
  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    DervProf wrote: »
    If interest rates (and therefore mortgage repayments) rose when property prices increased, but fell as property prices fall, I suspect that the property market might not attract so many speculators, and would therefore be a lot more stable.
    i'll explain.

    there's a bit more to interest rates mechanics than UK house prices - the BOE makes decisons on interest rates reltated to the economy not so that Willy from Walsal on £12k a year can afford to buy a 3 bed room house .
  • Orpheo
    Orpheo Posts: 1,058 Forumite
    chucky.jpg

    Oh for a rollseyes smiley. Is this Chucky's Revenge?
    chucky wrote: »
    oh dear, what a great start...

    so you're not going to define it?

    hold on... you've changed your mind in one post and are now defining it... how many personalities do you actually have??

    don't you mean if the government had done what Orpheo wanted, it would have allowed the market enviornment to do what Orpheo needed it to happen.

    chin up Oreo, don't worry about it. you'll understand one day

    Your response is typically full of strategies that avoid the fact that you have nothing to add but nose-thumbing.

    What makes you think that it would have suited me if the S had been allowed to HTF? On the contrary, I suspect that my significant savings deposits would have been lost in the black hole, such is the fraud.

    I have two personalities, one for chucky and one for everyone else.
    Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam
  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Orpheo wrote: »
    Your response is typically full of strategies that avoid the fact that you have nothing to add but nose-thumbing.
    oh it was a bit more than that from looking at the type of post you replied with.
    Orpheo wrote: »
    What makes you think that it would have suited me if the S had been allowed to HTF? On the contrary, I suspect that my significant savings deposits would have been lost in the black hole, such is the fraud.
    nice work - you got to love the standard issue house deposits that people feel the need to boast about on this forum. did it make you feel better telling me and the rest of the forum about the significant savings deposit that you 'have'?
  • Graham_Devon
    Graham_Devon Posts: 58,560 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Linton wrote: »
    FTBers dont buy average houses, they buy cheaper houses. Average houses, on average, are bought by people trading up.

    And according to the Nationwide survey, the average house price is £169K

    Not true anymore.

    With the age of FTB's being into the 30's, many require something more than the starter home.

    The starter homes were bought up by the BTL's and rented out to those who couldn't afford the same starter home.
  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 9 August 2010 at 9:33AM
    Not true anymore.

    With the age of FTB's being into the 30's, many require something more than the starter home.

    The starter homes were bought up by the BTL's and rented out to those who couldn't afford the same starter home.
    aren't they allowed to rent?

    but anyway... age has nothing to with it - the average of FTBs is basically the same as it was 20 years ago. this was explained to you just yesterday on this very thread...

    and so it begins... 20 pages of explaining to graham what was just explained to him yesterday...
  • DervProf
    DervProf Posts: 4,035 Forumite
    chucky wrote: »
    no idea - i don't make the rules and have control of what former PM's or even Chancellors say.


    define "sensible" lending?

    ps. please don't, it's quite subjective really and depends on peoples circumstances and isn't a one size fits all answer unfortunately.

    it requires a new thread...
    chucky wrote: »
    i'll explain.

    there's a bit more to interest rates mechanics than UK house prices - the BOE makes decisons on interest rates reltated to the economy not so that Willy from Walsal on £12k a year can afford to buy a 3 bed room house .

    True, it isn`t just about house prices. However, I have a hunch that when the BoE meet to discuss the setting of the base rate, they are more concerned about house prices than they let on. Only a few years ago, at the peak of the boom, they stated several times that when it comes to setting the rate, they don`t concern themselves with the property market, they were targetting CPI, which doesn`t include the cost of property buying/renting. I said at the time that they were backing themselves into a corner, because their actions were doing nothing to stop rapid HPI, and once house prices became too high, they would have a big problem to deal with.

    I suppose the argument against increasing the base rate that many will put forward is to help businesses. I think the real reason that the BoE will resist any rise in IR is because of the effect it will have on the heavily indebted public. No doubt a 1% rise in rates will not help some businesses, but it would have a far greater effect on the property market. I don`t think a small business with a modest amount of debt would be too troubled by a small increase in the cost of their overdraft, it`s the effect on their customer`s that would be a bigger problem.
    30 Year Challenge : To be 30 years older. Equity : Don't know, don't care much. Savings : That's asking for ridicule.
  • doire_2
    doire_2 Posts: 2,280 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    FTB are having trouble getting a mortgage? Good!

    The solution? Save for a deposit. It makes better sense in the long run. It also makes you more responsible
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.