PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Conflict in value between valuation survey and full structural survey

13»

Comments

  • Jowo wrote: »
    I understand why a shoddy refurb would deter a potential buyer but don't understand the obsession between the purchase price, cost of refurb and sale price (i.e. complete hang up about the potential profit being made.

    Ultimately any property is only worth what a buyer wants to pay for it.



    Sounds like basic capitalism to me - selling for greater than cost. I wasn't aware that many property investors do it as a charity service.



    It's not the time spent between previous purchase and getting it to market, is it, that determines its rise in value?! Few buyers these days, even those from conventional sellers rather than a property investor, get very far by saying 'but you only paid x for it x time ago therefore it's not worth it'.

    The quality of the refurb is a factor in adding value to it, plus how it compares to others of a similar size and standard in the locale. A seller doesn't have to 'discount' it because they've turned it round quickly for sale...

    I reckon that it's probably not worth an investors time buying a property and selling it on for less than 20% anyhow. You may have costed the new kitchen and rewire as being significantly less than 57k but you have amnesia when it comes to someone's time for the 3 month period, expenses associated with the purchase and sale, etc. Very lopsided.



    Diddums. This is between the previous purchaser and their lender and is of no concern to the current and prospective owners. Lots of us buy properties that are put up for sale following the financial problems, relationship breakdowns and deaths of the owners.



    If it seems so easy, join 'em.

    My advice is to get quotes for the work outlined and re-negotiate the price you are offering.

    My my, bit of a charmer aren’t you?
  • paul1964_2
    paul1964_2 Posts: 280 Forumite
    debsirn wrote: »

    You will need to budget for re-rendering all elevations and the possibility of subsidence existing in parts of the flank wall.

    Unfortunately, vendor doesn’t allow me to remove render coat for further investigation.

    Sounds like a property for an experienced developer / builder not a FTB.

    Don't waste any more time and money on this. Walk Away.
  • debsirn
    debsirn Posts: 8 Forumite
    Many thanks for all useful comments.
    I arrange local builder to have a look at the crack on pebbledash. Here is his comments
    "We have worked on several properties in this road and have found that most of
    the cracking is connected with the rendering, although a few of the cracks may be
    due to old movement over time. If after taking off the render we find severe cracking to
    brickwork we would be able to install retaining straps across the openings. In our opionion
    the costs would be no more than an additional £500.00 if indeed this will even be required."


    However, another builder (recommended by friend) is concern becasue the crack start about 2 feet from the floor and straight up to the first floor (about 3-4 meter long)

    I talk to the surveyor over the phone and he reckon that properties in this area have been built on solid soil which should not cause subsidence. The severe crack on this particular property is probably due to poor maintenance ( or never been maintenance)

    The survey report point out that property hasn't got any damp problem. Is it a good sign that such crack is just the rendering?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.