Ooh look... GB 1 - 0 Cleggertoff...

A._Badger

StevieJ wrote: »

I learn something everyday

Good. There's hope, then.

chucky

A._Badger wrote: »

You know for sure it's a Labour troll when they cite Labour cheerleaders like the BBC and the FT as reliable sources!

The problem isn't (yet) the UK's ability to borrow. It's the impact of paying it back.

Still, the past few years of living on Wonderland have demonstrated how feeble is the grasp of such fundamentals among ostriches.

you know what i like about you Mr Badger is that you are like the other frothers - inconsistent and discredit yourself frequently.

please keep it up :T

A._Badger wrote: »

I suggest you read the story from that noted mouthpiece of Tory propaganda, the BBC.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8690312.stm

It's pretty clear what was going on and will, no doubt, become even clearer as that stalwart of party so enthusiastically supported by StevieJ and kennyboy66, David Laws, starts digging into this muck heap.

http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.html?p=32953377&postcount=23

so let me get this right - is the BBC a Labour cheerleader or is the BBC mouthpiece of Tory propaganda or is it both

please explain we're all confused now

A._Badger

chucky wrote: »

you know what i like about you Mr Badger is that you are like the other frothers - inconsistent and discredit yourself frequently.

please keep it up :T

http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.html?p=32953377&postcount=23

so let me get this right - is the BBC the a Labour cheerleader or is it the mouthpiece of Tory propaganda or is it both - we're all confused now

Dear God, chucky you really are the most absolute moron. As I pointed out before when you made a fool of yourself with this one, the comment you quoted was irony.

I thought it was supposed to be Americans who don't 'get' irony. Seems we have to add the self-appointed forum milk monitor chucky to the list.

StevieJ

A._Badger wrote: »

Good. There's hope, then.

I take it you don't do irony keep up.

The Financial Times is backing the Conservatives in the General Election for the first time since 1987.
The newspaper, which has supported Labour since 1992, announced the switch in an editorial and argued that the Tories would create the best environment for enterprise and wealth creation.
The editorial expressed some reservations – including over the party's ''reflexive hostility'' to Europe – but said overall they offered the best option.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/election-2010/7664387/General-Election-2010-who-are-the-newspapers-backing.html

A._Badger

StevieJ wrote: »

I take it you don't do irony keep up.



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/election-2010/7664387/General-Election-2010-who-are-the-newspapers-backing.html

Key words 'for the first time since 1992'.

It's still dominated by the same writers, hacking out the same old warmed-over Keynesian tripe.

StevieJ

A._Badger wrote: »

Key words 'for the first time since 1992'.

It's still dominated by the same writers, hacking out the same old warmed-over Keynesian tripe.

Good try

A._Badger

StevieJ wrote: »

Good try

It was. Effortless, too.

How that rag can claim to be the voice of the financial/business sector, I've really no idea. It's an open goal for the Telegraph.

chucky

A._Badger wrote: »

Dear God, chucky you really are the most absolute moron.

oh dear - the forum frother trying to be insulting. what a prize mug you are...

A._Badger wrote: »

It was. Effortless, too.

nice attempt but keep on trying :rotfl: