We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

PLEASE READ - Posts by the MSE Team and BG's - merged

Options
18911131446

Comments

  • Mamzie
    Mamzie Posts: 2,540 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    I must admit I am very relieved that our postal and Text threads are safe. :T

    I am sorry to be a pain :o, but I'm still slightly confused. Could we have some further clarification if we are ok to continue with our small purchase required comps, using the max text cost of £1.50 as a guide.

    I am reading that some small cost is ok. I often find that if a comp needs a small purchase, it just means I swap brands for a while to get an entry, so it doesnt really cost me extra. But without the threads on here, I would very likely miss the comp completely. As it is we have some threads running (which I find very helpful) which need a small purchase, and others still being deleted.

    If they are still allowed, should we group them in a small purchase required thread, sub forum, or continue with the seperate threads, but maybe add purchase required to the title.
    My light may be on, but that doesn't always mean I am looking at the PC - I am far more likely to be cuddling or feeding Tianna atm, so please don't think I am ignoring you if I don't reply quickly :)

    Our Precious Baby Tianna has now joined our Family, she is much loved and very welcome, xxx
  • Former_MSE_Guy
    Former_MSE_Guy Posts: 1,650 Forumite
    I've been Money Tipped! Newshound! Chutzpah Haggler
    edited 4 May 2009 at 11:28AM
    This thread is to discuss the following:
    OfficialStamp.gif
  • annaka
    annaka Posts: 58 Forumite
    Hi guys!
    I totally agree with the idea of a separate "Low spend comps" thread!:beer:
    If i'm buying a pack of crisps or a chocolate, might as well go for the one with a chance of winning something...
    Why a £1.50 text is an acceptable spend, when 60p on a product (that one might have purchased anyway) + a chance to win a big prize is not?
    Also i'm still a little bit puzzled as to why the "Kit Kat Senses competition for 100 x £1000" i have posted has been deleted pretty much immediately, when Magnum and Doritos are still on...
    How good is a rule when it's being applied selectively ?
    :confused:
  • Gilla_2
    Gilla_2 Posts: 13,228 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    I like the postal comps thread the way it is now.

    Why change something that's not broken?
    42.7 percent of all statistics are made up on the spot
    :hello: Good Luck everyone !:hello:
  • josie301
    josie301 Posts: 4,654 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Gilla wrote: »
    I like the postal comps thread the way it is now.

    Why change something that's not broken?

    From what I read postals were not affected by this.

    What has been suggested is adding yet another sticky thread for 'low spend comps' within the main comps board.

    Although personally I don't see that is really necessary. So long as there is the hint in the title such as *purchase req*

    These comps seem to arrive in clusters then there are none for months - so it might be a wasted thread - and one that is overlooked (I barely have time to get through the main board - so if anything is in dailies or reg's then I usually miss them. :o)

    The clarification is in the rules - max £1.50 (if that covers a wasteful text then surely it covers a tub of butter or packet of crisps you will actually get some use from) although that does not explain why some are deleted and some are allowed.
    Jo x
    2007:£5181.09 2008: £6619.70 2009: £4284.49 2010: £5213.14 2011: £4980.62 2012: £3188.52 :)

  • Mamzie
    Mamzie Posts: 2,540 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    edited 3 May 2009 at 10:46PM
    I think if you look at the stickies, some of them could be joined together now, so that there were less. For instance the ones on expiry date, copying text, and even the 2 on searching could be added to the Rules sticky, etc. This one will one could drop and the relevent info also added to the rules.

    I do agree retaining the individual threads would be lovely, but I also feel that stills remains to be confirmed. I hope that by offering to use either one thread or a sub-forum, we could retain the comps if we were unable to have them as seperate threads. At the moment, we have some running and some being deleted still.

    When I posted the post below, I also pm'd it to MSE Andrea at the same time on the 29 April. So hopefully we'll get it clarified.
    Mamzie wrote: »
    I must admit I am very relieved that our postal and Text threads are safe. :T

    I am sorry to be a pain :o, but I'm still slightly confused. Could we have some further clarification if we are ok to continue with our small purchase required comps, using the max text cost of £1.50 as a guide.

    I am reading that some small cost is ok. I often find that if a comp needs a small purchase, it just means I swap brands for a while to get an entry, so it doesnt really cost me extra. But without the threads on here, I would very likely miss the comp completely. As it is we have some threads running (which I find very helpful) which need a small purchase, and others still being deleted.

    If they are still allowed, should we group them in a small purchase required thread, sub forum, or continue with the seperate threads, but maybe add purchase required to the title.
    My light may be on, but that doesn't always mean I am looking at the PC - I am far more likely to be cuddling or feeding Tianna atm, so please don't think I am ignoring you if I don't reply quickly :)

    Our Precious Baby Tianna has now joined our Family, she is much loved and very welcome, xxx
  • Cheeky_Chicken
    Cheeky_Chicken Posts: 5,336 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Post #64 reported to abuse for self promotion :)
    Al Mac Appreciation Society (AMAS) member # 6½
    This Will Be Mine 2009 Member #5 I just want to win a new iPod please
    Member of the missing kipper club
  • bluefish
    bluefish Posts: 66 Forumite
    Please bear with me. I am an absolute, absolute beginner and have entered very few competitions in my life. I have only just come across this issue on MSE.
    PLEASE would a very kind person just give me a clue how to start - from the very beginning. I spotted this forum and felt overwhelmed with it. Apologies for my naievety. Can anyone help? Thank you so much:confused:
  • hjb123
    hjb123 Posts: 32,002 Forumite
    bluefish wrote: »
    Please bear with me. I am an absolute, absolute beginner and have entered very few competitions in my life. I have only just come across this issue on MSE.
    PLEASE would a very kind person just give me a clue how to start - from the very beginning. I spotted this forum and felt overwhelmed with it. Apologies for my naievety. Can anyone help? Thank you so much:confused:

    your best thing to do would be to read the comping guide that Velvetglove has done HERE

    has lots of useful info in it


    good luck with competitions, you will find it pretty addictive
    Weight Loss - 102lb
  • bluefish
    bluefish Posts: 66 Forumite
    Thanks to HJB123. :beer:
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.