So long and thanks for all the fish recipes

jinky67

rubytuesday wrote: »

Well that's wasted an evening

no, thats lightened an evening for me:j:j:j

jinky67

poet123 wrote: »

Its OK, you're in (Jinky is a soft touch):p

I still have that rhubarb you know:p

candygirl

Mudbath wrote: »

I've never tried forcing rhubarb...would you recommend it?

Where would you force it?:eek::eek:Inbetween George and Ewan I presume:rotfl::rotfl:

poet123

rubytuesday wrote: »

Well that's wasted an evening

Shall we recap? just say the word. Although to be fair I think the point has been made, but if you want a condensed reminder, just say the word. I must say though that condensation (!!) is not my forte, but I could try;)

jinky67

have we finally all got over our collective PMT now then?:A

Has the cake done its job?
:rotfl:

poet123

jinky67 wrote: »

I still have that rhubarb you know:p

But I am not convinced you know how to use it....(bet no one ever said that to Ewan or even George):rotfl:

jinky67

poet123 wrote: »

(bet no one ever said that to Ewan or even George):rotfl:

:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

rosieben

poet123 wrote: »

....
I agree, this thread should be in DT, for some reason there seems a reluctance to move it.......

So, to sum up, no, argument is not my intent, fairness, honesty, and proper debate, without bias is.;)

Just to keep the record straight - I have never said, on this thread or anywhere else, that this thread should be moved to the arms. Please have the courtesy to read my posts properly before you respond.

louise3965

poet123 wrote: »

Its OK, you're in (Jinky is a soft touch):p

Well thank you. Mightily relieved. Could you send me a list of all the other big girls I need to suck up to :rotfl:

poet123

rosieben wrote: »

Strange that - again - the argument is pursued most persistently by someone who's never posted on OS before and who wasn't involved in the first thread in any meaningful way.

I'm reminded of another thread not so long ago when someone's first post on an OS thread was to provoke a totally meaningless argument about the rights and wrongs of grammar.

The Arms is the place for argument and the correct procedure for complaints has been pointed out several times.

We can assume that anyone who still persists with the argument is only interested in provoking the argument itself.

So, as you construe this as argument and deem the Arms the place for such argument is it not logical to assume that you wish such argument to be moved to there?:D and, as you make no reference to my point re my previous posting about how I followed corrrect procedure, it would appear you missed that point when you posted as you did re those procedures.

So I say again, do keep up.;)