We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Property Misdescription - Estate Agent Refusing Liability
Comments
-
Do estate agents actually look at HIPs for properties they are selling? May be they should!RICHARD WEBSTER
As a retired conveyancing solicitor I believe the information given in the post to be useful assuming any properties concerned are in England/Wales but I accept no liability for it.0 -
Richard_Webster wrote: »Do estate agents actually look at HIPs for properties they are selling? May be they should!
Same goes for buyers though.0 -
princessamy86 wrote: »:eek: This sounds like a total nightmare. Really, if the bank knew, they should have made it clear to the agent at the start. That is literally how it happens with a repo, often the first we know of it is a contractor bringing keys into the office.
With regards to the PMA and the incorrect details, I do think the agent is in the wrong. It is their job to check it all out, and if the garage door is bricked up I would have at least thought somebody would have the common sense to check out the reasons behind it. As far as I am aware (dredging up first year law module), you relied upon the information to enter into a contract with the vendor, and have spent money to this end. Your solicitor will advise better, but IIRC you are entitled to your money back (think it's called damages?) as you were provided with false information which you had reason to believe was true, and you later relied on that information to enter into a contract with the vendor to purchase the property.
I think you'll just have to persevere with contacting Trading Standards and the Ombudsman, the EA isn't going to pay up without a fight. They're probably hoping if they stall you long enough, you'll just go away, but if you escalate it through the proper channels there becomes a point where they can't ignore you anymore. In the meantime I would certainly look for another place to buy!
The garage wasnt actually bricked up when we saw it, the bank decided to brick the garage off and sell the house with problem still intact after we identified the problem.
Cheers for the info tho its much appreciated, Im just going to perservere and see what happens. I think they may be slightly worried as they are constantly ringing me and I keep saying that any discussions must be in writing to record the outcomes, which they dont seem to want to do. I'll see what happens tho and post the outcome, if nothing happens then at least Ive given the EA grief for 6 months.
Ive found a new property and hopefully the sale will go through in the next 2-3months.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.9K Spending & Discounts
- 244.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.2K Life & Family
- 258.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards