We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Over-indebtedness in britain
Comments
-
I'm interested what effect and increase of let's say 0.5% of IR will have on housing market.
I also suspect that there are lots of people who just cope...0 -
-
How about this as an example of reckless lending.
According to Michael Lewis (taken from his latest book 'The Big Short: Inside the Doomsday Machine'), at the height of the sub-prime housing market boom in the US, one deluded banker approved a $750,000 mortgage to a Mexican strawberry picker in California, who did not speak any English and whose annual take-home pay was $14,000.
.0 -
People have clearly taken their lead from the Government who have been equally irresponsible with borrowing.0
-
How about this as an example of reckless lending.
According to Michael Lewis (taken from his latest book 'The Big Short: Inside the Doomsday Machine'), at the height of the sub-prime housing market boom in the US, one deluded banker approved a $750,000 mortgage to a Mexican strawberry picker in California, who did not speak any English and whose annual take-home pay was $14,000.
.
surely the intention was to packge that loan up with more of the same and sell it on for a quick profit.0 -
Daddy-Spendless wrote: »surely the intention was to packge that loan up with more of the same and sell it on for a quick profit.
To a British bank?0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »The criteria for borrowing has changed noticably in the past 18 months. If for no other reason than the lenders taking high risks have left the market, sold out their loan books or been taken over.
Many people haven't yet comprehended that the rules have changed. As until they try and remortgage, move house , obtain consent to let they won't be aware.
The concern must be at the moment that while people adjust to a higher petrol prices, no pay rise and an increased cost of living. That the day of a rise in interest rates draws nearer.
After a year now, most people with mortgages have enjoyed historically low mortgage rates (even those on 6% aren't high in real terms). So there's a major hit heading that people may find hard to absorb.
The report is more to do with unsecured lending than mortgages, and already interest rates on credit cards for those unable to manage them, are punitive.
While 6% mortgages are not high in absolute terms, they are probably the highest real interest rates I've seen (if you compare with either base rates, inflation, or Wage inflation).
The big problem will be when the Gov't mortgage support starts to unwind.US housing: it's not a bubble
Moneyweek, December 20050 -
lemonjelly wrote: »1 in 5 are using one form of credit to pay off another form of credit
Demand for credit is strong
1 in 10 households are in structural arrears - peaking between Oct 09 - Feb 10
1 in 12 are paying 30% of their income on debt repayment. 1 in 8 are spending 20% on the same.
Is there any way, now things have reached this stage, that people who've got into these sorts of situations can be helped to get their finances straight in a managed way and without the loss of their homes and collapse of family life?
How do we, as a society, get past this and into a more sustainable way of life?0 -
a further 10% reduction in GDP.0
-
I remember, some years ago, a certain lady gave us all a little lesson in equity. Cue funny rumpty- dumpty music. Picture of a house. Bit of a line across it. What was underneath the line was what you owed then another line above it. That was what it was worth. And do you know, that nice lady said that the top bit was what you could spend and she knew some very nice people that would give you that money. Ever so nice it was.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards