We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Tip from an electrician

2

Comments

  • wallbash wrote: »
    Agree totally about gas

    But my argument is that I have 'played' with electrics for over 35 years , I know my limits .
    I won't have some bright spark .... in an office now telling me I cant .
    Just because I have not got a 'bit' of paper.

    As I agree with you, but sadly I live in the UK where the punishments for people that think for themselves or have any form of common sense carries a custodial sentence
  • wallbash
    wallbash Posts: 17,775 Forumite
    Cant recall anyone , working on there own house having been prosecuted yet , but I might well be wrong.

    There was that case with a gas explosion a few years ago.
  • BillTrac
    BillTrac Posts: 1,869 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    First please don't get me started on Part P! As a time-served sparkie with 35 years experience, to be told I have to either pay £450 per year, or pay some numpty £50 a pop to pass my work it really gets my back up(can you tell?;))

    Anyway, can I ask the OP why spurs? One spur I could understand just connect into the nearest socket. But if you are having several spurs and the distances aren't too great why not expand the ring circuit? Then you will only have two cables at each socket, and you know it is the better way.

    Another suggestion might be to use a 30Amp junction box. Ring cables into the JB, add the spur cable then you only have a single cable to worry about. Not the best method, but a method after all
  • mikey72
    mikey72 Posts: 14,680 Forumite
    BillTrac wrote: »
    First please don't get me started on Part P! As a time-served sparkie with 35 years experience, to be told I have to either pay £450 per year, or pay some numpty £50 a pop to pass my work it really gets my back up(can you tell?;))

    Anyway, can I ask the OP why spurs? One spur I could understand just connect into the nearest socket. But if you are having several spurs and the distances aren't too great why not expand the ring circuit? Then you will only have two cables at each socket, and you know it is the better way.

    Another suggestion might be to use a 30Amp junction box. Ring cables into the JB, add the spur cable then you only have a single cable to worry about. Not the best method, but a method after all

    Not the right method either.
  • waynehayes
    waynehayes Posts: 427 Forumite
    mikey72 wrote: »
    Not the right method either.


    Why so? It's perfectly acceptable to spur from a junction box.
  • mikey72
    mikey72 Posts: 14,680 Forumite
    waynehayes wrote: »
    Why so? It's perfectly acceptable to spur from a junction box.

    Single socket through a junction box, or several spurs through a 13A fused outlet, not a couple of spurs through a 30A junction box.
    The junction box has to be accessible for inspection as well, not hidden under the floor, or in the wall somewhere.
  • waynehayes
    waynehayes Posts: 427 Forumite
    mikey72 wrote: »
    Single socket through a junction box, or several spurs through a 13A fused outlet, not a couple of spurs through a 30A junction box.
    The junction box has to be accessible for inspection as well, not hidden under the floor, or in the wall somewhere.

    I didn't realise OP was adding more than one spur from the same socket. Indeed, the number of spurs off a single fused outlet is in theory unlimited.
  • wallbash
    wallbash Posts: 17,775 Forumite
    The junction box has to be accessible for inspection as well, not hidden under the floor, or in the wall somewhere.

    Not one for following all the regs to the letter, could somone clarify that posting .
    I am not disputing it , not mocking it , just genuinely would like some clarification.
  • mikey72
    mikey72 Posts: 14,680 Forumite
    All connections should be able to be inspected, so junction boxes should not be used where they are not accessible, or it is not obvious that they are there.
  • YorkshireBoy
    YorkshireBoy Posts: 31,541 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    wallbash wrote: »
    Not one for following all the regs to the letter, could somone clarify that posting .
    I am not disputing it , not mocking it , just genuinely would like some clarification.
    As with most things in this field it's open to interpretation. For example, the Regs don't (I believe) define "accessible", although the term is used in Reg 526.3

    There's some discussion* on this topic on the IET forums, and some examples of 'opinions' given by NICEIC inspectors. Google 'junction boxes accessible' for more info, and/or see here.


    * Including the use of 'permanent' joints such as crimping and soldering, which would mean the joint did not need to be accessible for inspection.


    Disclaimer: Although I'm a fully qualified electrical engineer, domestic/commercial work is not my field...process control and materials/mechanical handling is. :)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.