We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
House prices: Rises may start to slow, surveyors say
Comments
-
Graham_Devon wrote: »As I said to chucky. With the amount goalpost changing and word changing going on, it's no wonder I don't "get it".
This whole "you don't get it" is used in nearly every thread now by literally 4 people. You, really, chucky, Hamish. The same 3 people with the same thoughts who thank each other religiously, who enjoy changing contexts of what was said.
So yes, you are right, I never have a clue really what you are going on about as you change tact so much. An example is what you have just done. Asked me how I thought demand was static, telling me the article said different. Now you come back and you are talking about a completely different article, therefore, I don't get it.
Am I supposed to guess you are not talking about a specific article when you reference a specific one? If I don't guess correctly, does that mean I don't get it?
This is a thread Graham.
It started with a link to the BBc report and it progressed to the source document linked by Rinoa which had much better detail.
No tact was changed, you just clearly didn't want to use some of the data and have been found out yet again.
Perhaps if you opened your eyes and mind to the topic being discussed, you wont have the problem that you describe.:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
It's rather disturbing that 'bullish' posters always resort to abuse and foul language when they invariably lose the argument.
Hopefully with the moderators' help we can successfully tackle this growing problem among certain posters.
Interesting take as you never pull up "bearish" poster who do the same or far worse.
So you have a clan mindset and it is not the abuse that is the problem just the other "clan"0 -
I'm actually totally impartial. It just so happens that the only people I've reluctantly been forced to report for abusive behaviour have been 'bullish' ones like Really2, chucky, Hamish McTavish, Rinoa, StiflersMom, etc.
All these named posters seem to resort to abuse when they lose the argument. Maybe they need to get some professional help, I don't really know.
Care to point mine out? Or were you just banned yourself for abuse.
We all know, so please stop the petty vendettas.
PS False accusations could be seen as abuse and trolling.:)0 -
-
-
How could I do that? They've all been deleted, and rightly so, by the moderators because of their very abusive content.
If only you could stop being so abusive to other people then I wouldn't have to report you so often. Please be nice to moneysavers.
How have you been thanked 93 times in 60 posts yet only have 6 to your name.:rotfl:
Can't think I have ever had one removed TBH, but then you......
Lets see what happens.;)0 -
It's rather disturbing that 'bullish' posters always resort to abuse and foul language when they invariably lose the argument.
Hopefully with the moderators' help we can successfully tackle this growing problem among certain posters.
Is it not disturbing that you have 93 thanks in 60 posts yet your post count is 5.
When did you have this newfound revelation and delete your previous posts?
You seem to have a blinkered view that abusive posts are only from "bullish" posters.
In your self propelled position as abuse reporter, I will find it interesting to point out when you are not being impartial.:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
How have you been thanked 93 times in 60 posts yet only have 6 to your name.:rotfl:
HeHe beat me to it.
they must have had to delete the other 54 posts for reasons we can only imagine
:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards