House prices: Rises may start to slow, surveyors say

Graham_Devon

Really2 wrote: »

The irony of it.:D (try the bold bit GD)

Oh looksee!

No answer to the question!

Tries to condemn me for not giving evidence of my own thoughts, which I followed up with "IMO". And then changes the subject when I ask how I am supposed to give evidence of my opinion.

You just don't get it do you. I aint starting an argument. ISTL has jumped in on me asking how I can have my own opinion when the article in this thread says different (when it didn't), then refers to another thread....you see the opportunity to tell me I'm starting an argument and ask me for something you know I can't give and tell me I'm trying to create something.

I'm all for it today btw. I have a massive print run going and time on my hands. So bring on your petty little sniffling squabbles desperately changing the context of the thread to try and make some argument out of it.

I await the arrival of chucky now, to drivel some kind of language onto the thread which no one can really understand.

chucky

Really2 wrote: »

But then writing a rant is so much more believable than supplying any evidence.....

give it up really - the evidence is all there in front of him

the man is a bitter little troll or either incredibly thick

Really2

Graham_Devon wrote: »

Tries to condemn me for not giving evidence of my own thoughts, which I followed up with "IMO". And then changes the subject when I ask how I am supposed to give evidence of my opinion.

Are you OK? Where did you said IMO? secondly how have I changed the subject?

Graham_Devon

Really2 wrote: »

Are you OK?

Yup.

Post 20.

Graham_Devon wrote: »

Think demand is pretty static currently. But the supply is up. IMO.

chucky

Really2 wrote: »

Are you OK? Where of you said IMO? secondly how have I changed the subject?

you haven't, he's now deflected it onto something else once he has been found out.

it's not your fault that you're more intelligent than him - he's obviously got a very big inferiority complex that he needs to address :eek:

Really2

Graham_Devon wrote: »

Yup.

Post 20.

Cross wires graham (for a change) I am talking about dragging my ID in to the argument.

I thought for a second your reply would have something to do with what you had quoted.
How silly of me............

Anyway I think when the wookie defence is used it is time to leave the thread.

chucky

Graham_Devon wrote: »

Yup.

Post 20.

i raise you post 16 that gives you the demand and the supply - but that didn't suit your blinkered viewpoint...

it's one months figures - draw your own blinkered conclusions

Nutrisse

chucky wrote: »

the man is a bitter little troll or either incredibly thick

[SIZE=+1]Abuse Report Received [#662377][/SIZE]

Graham_Devon

Really2 wrote: »

Cross wires graham (for a change) I am talking about dragging my ID in to the argument.

I thought for a second your reply would have something to do with what you had quoted.
How silly of me............

Anyway I think when the wookie defence is used it is time to leave the thread.

I apologise.

When you said:

Are you OK? Where did you said IMO? secondly how have I changed the subject?

I thought you were asking me where I said "IMO". Which is why I referenced the post number and also quoted the part where I said it.

I do apologise, as obviously we crossed wires here.

You have indeed edited the post, as can be seen by the "edited by" stamp underneath your post and added on the bit about where you have changed the subject.

I could not answer that part of your question when I answered the first part. As that second part wasn't actually there at that point in time.

Therefore I apologise again for A) answering the question you did ask, but didn't ask (apparently). not answering the question you had not yet asked and C) for not guessing you may add further questions onto your post at a later date and ansewring them before you had asked them, therefore, creating crossed wires.

Really2

Perhaps things would be so much clearer if you had understood what I had questioned on this thread.
I put it in bold (hint it is not actually to do with house prices but what you have said about users)

But nevermind I ain't going around in circles again today.

:hello: